|
Post by Paradox on Oct 6, 2009 6:54:05 GMT -5
The online games of Dan-Ball are supposed to have different features. Think, what if they gave the Stick Men weapons in SI? It'd be too close to SR.
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Oct 23, 2009 22:53:36 GMT -5
I do not see how adding an uploading feature is too much like pg. Recently high score lists have been added to many of the games, but I do not think that this makes them much more like each other. feel free to refute this, as I may very well be convinced otherwise, but I currently do not see how adding an upload function would make it to much like powder game.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 23, 2009 23:17:27 GMT -5
Hmm...
Well, providing uploading capabilities would make Earth Editor somewhat similar to Powder Game, but I believe that EE would still maintain its unique identity as a world creator. There may be similarities between EE and PG, but EE would still be distinct with its inclusion of meteors, walls, black and white holes, and orbiting capabilities.
|
|
|
Post by royalhydro on Nov 27, 2009 1:06:11 GMT -5
Everything thats been suggested is basically a brand new game.. But ee and ps would be good fusion
Space Creator? (name)
New game?
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Nov 29, 2009 14:39:47 GMT -5
well, if the added mbh and mwh to ee it would be like a combination of ee and ps, so I don't see why adding a different game wold be nesicary....</runonsentence>
|
|
|
Post by BlueWinter on Nov 29, 2009 15:22:41 GMT -5
I think it would be nice to have a couple more EE updates before adding an uploading feature, to make those uploads a little bit more interesting...
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Nov 30, 2009 23:21:13 GMT -5
now that you mention it, i agree. maybe adding clone? would clone create bh and wh or just other elements? this would probably cause a lot of "light speed" uploads...(cloning salt and wh, both in the center)
|
|
|
Post by BlueWinter on Dec 1, 2009 12:15:43 GMT -5
To be honest, I was thinking more of magma and stone, as EE is a planet-making type game...
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Dec 20, 2009 11:19:06 GMT -5
hmm, your right, magma and stone would make more sense than clone. Would meteor also be able to create magma? would stone be solid like wall & ice, or would it be a powder like sand and seed?
|
|
|
Post by BlueWinter on Dec 31, 2009 14:21:29 GMT -5
I think Wall would suffice as a solid stone. How about:
Magma + Water = Stone Magma + Sand = More Magma Magma + Stone = More Magma Magma + Seed = Fire Magma + Salt = More Magma Magma + Ice = Water Magma + Meteor = NER (No Elemental Reaction) Magma + Wall = NER Magma + Fire = NER
Stone + Magma = More Magma Stone + Meteor = Magma Stone + Fire = Magma (After a long period of contact time) Stone + Sand = NER Stone + Water = NER Stone + Wall = NER Stone + Seed = NER Stone + Salt = NER Stone + Ice = NER
|
|
|
Post by runescape on Jan 1, 2010 21:36:37 GMT -5
I'm a n00b who likes to advertise my site which sucks monkey nuts!!! Post Fixed up a bit ~GGIma let you go this time, but don't advertise anymore.
|
|
|
Post by GWPDKQO on Jan 6, 2010 0:09:24 GMT -5
SpamBot has been taken care of ~GG
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Jan 6, 2010 0:42:30 GMT -5
Hi spambot
|
|
|
Post by WEJFIOWEJ on Jan 7, 2010 2:53:30 GMT -5
I'm another spam bot!
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jan 7, 2010 9:32:12 GMT -5
Sheesh, two on one thread?
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Jan 11, 2010 19:43:16 GMT -5
those sound like great reactions, but i think: Stone + Fire = Magma (After a long period of contact time) could be made more specific, and possibly tweaked. do you think that maybe instead of counting the ammount of collisions, or frames or something like that, it could have a 1/? chance of turning to magma every frame it was touching fire (possibly every frame it was toucing more fire than water) similar to magma and stone in pg, or disappearing steam?
|
|
|
Post by gilguy on Mar 12, 2010 17:50:18 GMT -5
i like guyimarmor's idea #11, mostly. really would like that. more refined version (by me): bacteria: eat at very slow rate, mainly each other and plants. kinda useless, fish food is their best use. fish: ocean only, bigger and better versions of bacteria. amphibians: to land! they make very small nests reptiles: land only, bigger and better than amphibians birds: the only flyers for a while, otherwise same as reptiles mammals:this is where the fun starts. live in groups with large nests primates:simple tools. live in packs. humans: can make fire, live in packs, and primate's tools can be used, and kill each other sometimes without eating them. tame mammals to ride sometimes. phsicic humans: make spaceships and other cool tools: make holes to get stones to build HUGE buildings, and 1/3 chance of attacking physcic humans ( or rather, aliens ) from other planets. may breed birds to be huge dragon-thingys and ride on them. Like it?
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 13, 2010 0:34:42 GMT -5
Hmm, there's an idea. Not too sure about the psychic humans, though. Seems like general life.
Of course, when viewed to scale, you would have to have one pixel per city or space station of whatnot. And bacteria would be way too small.
Hmm, this seems a bit more like evolution than planet building.
|
|
|
Post by gilguy on Mar 14, 2010 17:22:45 GMT -5
well, planets do have life right?
|
|
|
Post by TheSeaweedDoctor on Mar 14, 2010 18:04:16 GMT -5
I say they morph this game with Powder Game
|
|