|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 27, 2009 19:11:56 GMT -5
50% warning For this post: Hey fag that was my scheme And countess others on chat. He has personally called me "fag" about 3 times. Hes said it countless more times on chat, though i know i've witnessed at least 6.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 27, 2009 20:23:15 GMT -5
He keeps calling people bundles of wood...
By the way, why is that word not censored to something hilarious? I move to change it to Molopoy!
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Jun 27, 2009 20:46:00 GMT -5
Fa- is bundles of wood? ...lol
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 27, 2009 22:16:03 GMT -5
It is censored. "fag" is censored to fag I think he deserves worse. Here is another rule that applies, and has a more severe warning: Sexual Harassment Risk: INSTANT IP BANPertaining to reproductive activity harassment is anything to sexually insult another member. We know of this behavior and we don't tolerate it. We don't care whether you're joking or not, ANY Pertaining to reproductive activity harassment will earn you instant, and most likely permanent, ban. Again, we don't tolerate such behavior. Saying anything like "u queer", etc, is and will be deemed as Pertaining to reproductive activity. It says saying "u queer" is sexual harassment. I would go on to think that using the word "fag" in similar context deserves the same. I gave the lesser of two punishments because banning him without consent would have made everyone freak out at me. What do you think? Should he be banned?
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 27, 2009 22:58:26 GMT -5
Well, with the first rule, he should have 66% warning. When i consulted him about his offense, he had this to say: Then I'm pretty sure he banned me from chat.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 27, 2009 23:04:33 GMT -5
He did. Should I unban coldfusion?
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Jun 27, 2009 23:20:22 GMT -5
Yes, unban coldfusion. Then, I want you to ban Ozone. Then I want you to go to his house. I want you to remove any innocent people, furniture, and animals from the house. Then I want you to lock Ozone in. Then I want you to set fire to it.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 27, 2009 23:24:59 GMT -5
No way! There is not a chance I am gonna remove any innocent people first! In fact, I'm gonna shove innocent people in!
Anyhow, he has been warned. Problem solved?
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 27, 2009 23:40:16 GMT -5
No. Listo why is the rule inefective now? why are you just bringing it up now? Is it cause its ozone?
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 28, 2009 5:54:40 GMT -5
So it is OK in the forums to have people sexually harrassing you...?
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Jun 28, 2009 9:44:59 GMT -5
Dude, you can't warn/ban people on the forums for whatever happens on chat.
|
|
|
Post by Saza on Jun 28, 2009 9:46:11 GMT -5
Really? Guys: "Fa-" is NOT Sexual Harassment... It's just a rude name to all someone or a pile of sticks... You guys fail.
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Jun 28, 2009 10:03:52 GMT -5
Even if it IS using social minority as an insult(Which it's not) it isn't a 50% warning. It takes THREE to give 20%.
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 28, 2009 10:13:48 GMT -5
with 10 offenses, you get to 66%. I figured more than one person would bring that up so i took the liberty of only giving him 50%. And yes the 'Use of minorities as a derogatary term' rule also applies to chat. Did you even read the rule?
And Fallout, did you read myt whole post the rule states that calling someone a queer is sexual harassment. How is calling someone a fag any different? I think an ip ban is too much. I do think he should be banned though.
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Jun 28, 2009 10:19:17 GMT -5
Yes I did. Chat rules don't give you warnings on the forum. Because calling someone a fag is not sexual harrassment. Calling someone a queer is. Calling someone a fag is ONLY AN INSULT, NOTHING ELSE.
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 28, 2009 10:25:00 GMT -5
... ... I did not give him a warning for harassment. Read the first post. Look at the freakin subject. Does it say "Ozone - Sexual Harassment" No. It says "Ozone - Use of Social Groups as a derogatary term" And that rule can be punished for chat offenses.
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Jun 28, 2009 10:34:18 GMT -5
I did, moron. And look at your previous post.
And did you read my post? I said that fag is NOT a social minority.
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 28, 2009 10:40:35 GMT -5
I said First post. Say it with me F-I-R-S-T post. and yes 'fag' in the manner ozone uses it, at least on chat, refers to the gay community. Which is by the way, mentioned in the rule. So before you start flaming me on your next post, carefully read the entire thread, and the entire rule.
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Jun 28, 2009 10:43:48 GMT -5
Fag has nothing to do with gays. Get your damn facts straight. And I said your previous post. PREVIOUS POST. I read all the posts here. Now you read them.
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 28, 2009 10:53:31 GMT -5
Its hard to reason with you when your flaming me DE. We were all fine with ozones current warning until you and fallout decide that its not sexual harassment. IT wouldn't matter anyway, cause according to listo we can now sexually harass people all we want. The rule does not count. You said you read the post. Then you said you quoted it. The quote was not from the first post however. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggot_(slang)Why don't you check that out. 'Fag', or 'Faggot' are used as slang for an insult to homosexuals. I know this is how he used it. He said it. I said not to gay bash. Then he called me 'fag'.
|
|