|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 10:50:25 GMT -5
I want to implement the five word rule...
10-20% warning for
posts that have less than 5 words,
OR
posts that do not explain clearly...
this is useful for:
-so people have to explain WHY they agree or disagree... -no confusion between members -more info
|
|
|
Post by Exthara on Jul 22, 2008 11:01:44 GMT -5
Well me and the Listo don't really agree....
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:08:56 GMT -5
We'll have a discussion here why or why not...
for now i'll think of other things...
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:23:11 GMT -5
I disagree, Silver. And I refuse to explain why I disagree, because of the fact that I disagree with it.
Lol.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:26:22 GMT -5
So confusing...
Okay then let us put the rule WHERE IT DOES MATTER ( Serious Debates board, PG board)
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:28:43 GMT -5
It's not confusing. It's simple! If I disagree with your rule, then naturally I'm not going to explain why I disagree, because I disagree with what it is that I am disagreeing with.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:34:00 GMT -5
lol
I get it...
You disagreeing with my rule so if you explain why you disagree you will be agreeing...
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:34:54 GMT -5
Exactly!
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:40:16 GMT -5
you broke the rule! lol
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:41:47 GMT -5
It doesn't matter if I broke the rule because first of all, it's not even a rule yet, and secondly and most importantly, I disagree with it.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:43:29 GMT -5
Why do you disagree with me though?
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:45:24 GMT -5
I can't tell you that, because if I explained why I disagree with your rule, then I would be agreeing with the rule.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:49:39 GMT -5
But the rule isnt implemented yet so it doesn't matter if you explain the rule because you have been following the rule the whole time... (More than 5 words) >
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:51:23 GMT -5
I disagree.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:54:09 GMT -5
): Now thats just mean!
If we can find a way to get what you like and get what I like, I will be happy...
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Jul 22, 2008 11:55:53 GMT -5
Yes (under 5 words)
;D
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 11:57:50 GMT -5
Lol
Very funny...
(Lol is counted as three words and any other accronym...)
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Jul 22, 2008 12:34:31 GMT -5
Got word from De-Listo and he said this rule will not go into effect...
At least not in THE WHOLE FORUM...
Can we put this rule in the sersious debate board?
|
|
|
Post by Exthara on Jul 22, 2008 13:01:18 GMT -5
Only there I suppose.
|
|
|
Post by thelisto on Jul 22, 2008 13:10:17 GMT -5
So many Paradox's.
I don't think it should be implemented. I can make a code so that people can't post something under [__] words but it'll just cause confusion and frustration. Some people rather answer with "Ok", "Alright", "Awesome","Welcome","Bye","Fine","No","Yes", and Etc... So I'm sorry but this rule will be vetoed.
|
|