|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:10:54 GMT -5
actually, relativity was proved, because a picture of the stars near the sun was taken during the eclipse and the light was in different positions, showing that the light bended. I'm talking about special relativity. That doesn't disprove my point.
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 18:12:52 GMT -5
That's true, well I'm no expert with special relativity.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:15:47 GMT -5
Special relativity is the theory that space and time are interconnected and light is a leading force in their internal workings.
Which I believe is complete s*
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 18:16:54 GMT -5
Sounds like dimensional crap.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:17:17 GMT -5
But you believe it!
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 18:18:51 GMT -5
In some ways, I guess.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:21:22 GMT -5
So you're a hypocrite!
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 18:23:19 GMT -5
No, I'm just saying it's a little extreme.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:23:51 GMT -5
That doesn't change the fact that you are a hypocrite!
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 18:25:07 GMT -5
What's the definition of a hypocrite?
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty333 on Feb 28, 2009 18:25:33 GMT -5
This is hard to follow... I'm leaving this debate. Bye! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 28, 2009 18:26:36 GMT -5
It's like a guy who drives into your driveway and tells you never to drive a car.
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Feb 28, 2009 20:23:14 GMT -5
How am I a hypocrite if I believe in it kinda. The guys not a hypocrite if he drives into your driveway telling you that there are bad things and good things about cars.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Feb 28, 2009 23:43:33 GMT -5
This is not technically for debate, but for clarification and definition.www.nasa.gov/worldbook/blackhole_worldbook.htmlWhat better place to look up a black hole than at the National Air and Space Administration? Black holes result when a star at least three times as massive as our Sun dies and collapses. The resulting masses, black holes, are so dense that some are believed to be smaller than an average atom's nucleus. The gravitational pull of black holes get stronger as you approach the surface of the black hole, and eventually there is a point in space around the black hole called the event horizon where gravity is infinitely strong. Anything that reaches the event horizon, even light, is pulled in without any hope of escape. Black holes, because they absorb light, cannot be seen except by observation of nearby masses or by observation of immense x-ray emission. teachspacescience.org/graphics/pdf/10001043.pdfThis is based off NASA information and is also a reliable source. It is longer, but it has more information and presents it in a more reader-friendly manner. Take a look at it. There is even a glossary of certain terms, such as event horizon (distance from center of black hole where escape velocity is equivalent to the speed of light).
My thread, my beautiful thread about black holes! Where has it gone (rhetorical question: don't answer)?
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 1, 2009 5:26:01 GMT -5
It's just SM and SC arguing. They've done it on 4 threads now........ STOP IT!!
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Mar 1, 2009 8:53:01 GMT -5
I'm telling him to stop it! He won't listen!
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 1, 2009 10:51:33 GMT -5
He will, but he wont take notice
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Mar 1, 2009 12:17:01 GMT -5
Fine, okay so back on topic. I say that black holes are no present in the Earth, such as teh Bermuda Triangle Theory, but they still have something strange about them. The strangest is that they are 2-D, meaning you can go under one without getting pulled in. I told you i would research and I did.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 1, 2009 15:22:28 GMT -5
2D? If it was 2D it would shatter on impact of ANYTHING, even a slight amount of gravity from a DUST PARTICLE.
I mean, scientists thought they were 4D, but you CAN'T GO IN THAT DIRECTION IF YOU ARE A 3D OBJECT.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 1, 2009 17:01:43 GMT -5
2d objects dont exist. It would have atoms or w/e going horizontal, but none vertical. Therefore it has atoms, no atoms or it is a paradox.
|
|