|
Post by Elton Nike on Aug 10, 2009 8:36:53 GMT -5
Well , Teleportation May not be Possible because we have no Possible Theories. But we do have the Wormhole And BlackHole Concept. Making a Minature Blackhole and wormhole takes Titanic Amounts of Energy. Mainly Eletrical. It will problably also need to be Static. I think theres a smart article in Wikipedia. Using so will problably not make you move at all but just make you go through a microscoptical "Tunnle" Then the Wormhole will decompress you at the other side. The Compression might not kill you. But litertly SHRINK you. I dought this but you never know.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 10, 2009 11:45:54 GMT -5
I'm surprised that you don't get what I'm trying to say.
"Physics of the impossible" is an oxymoron because if it is impossible, it therefore is defined to defy physics. hence being impossible.
|
|
|
Post by ROBiT on Aug 10, 2009 12:58:10 GMT -5
Well , Teleportation May not be Possible because we have no Possible Theories. But we do have the Wormhole And BlackHole Concept. Making a Minature Blackhole and wormhole takes Titanic Amounts of Energy. Mainly Eletrical. It will problably also need to be Static. I think theres a smart article in Wikipedia. Using so will problably not make you move at all but just make you go through a microscoptical "Tunnle" Then the Wormhole will decompress you at the other side. The Compression might not kill you. But litertly SHRINK you. I dought this but you never know. sorry for the off topic, but stop capitalizing random words. "titanic", "amount", "energy", "static", "miniature", "blackhole", "electrical", none of those need be capitalized.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 10, 2009 13:05:17 GMT -5
Black holes are not teleportation devices. They release the matter they obtained through Hawking Radiation
|
|
|
Post by SilentWaves on Aug 15, 2009 21:12:58 GMT -5
Hawking radiation is a radiation that comes from a certain area surrounding earth
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 16, 2009 16:50:21 GMT -5
SW, no. Just no.
Hawking radiation is caused by virtual particles and black holes. Those are nowhere near Earth, fortunately. One virtual particle falls into the black hole, the other does not. This means both matter and antimatter. The antimatter isn't very likely to survive for long.
In other words, it's what SM said.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Aug 18, 2009 21:07:48 GMT -5
Bump, I want to see what you guys do to this thread more. lol
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Aug 18, 2009 21:29:35 GMT -5
Debate threads don't get locked. That was a rule we all agreed upon. Not only that, but three days is hardly a bump in contrast to ten times that time period.
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Aug 19, 2009 10:37:11 GMT -5
yea... not really a bump.... oh well....
Well it was a great book indeed..... personally I think that his predictions were really accurate...
I like what he says.... it makes sense...
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 19, 2009 12:41:57 GMT -5
SW, no. Just no. Hawking radiation is caused by virtual particles and black holes. Those are nowhere near Earth, fortunately. One virtual particle falls into the black hole, the other does not. This means both matter and antimatter. The antimatter isn't very likely to survive for long. In other words, it's what SM said. Could people STFU with the antimatter shit? Just because a similar particle has an opposite charge from another doesn't mean it isn't made of matter.
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Aug 20, 2009 8:38:01 GMT -5
SW, no. Just no. Hawking radiation is caused by virtual particles and black holes. Those are nowhere near Earth, fortunately. One virtual particle falls into the black hole, the other does not. This means both matter and antimatter. The antimatter isn't very likely to survive for long. In other words, it's what SM said. Could people STFU with the antimatter shit? Just because a similar particle has an opposite charge from another doesn't mean it isn't made of matter. I'm pretty sure anti-matter IS matter. Except Qwertythepie DID NOT said that anti-matter ISN'T matter. I'm not sure what you are talking about Sandmaster?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 20, 2009 9:42:50 GMT -5
Well, I have a thing against anti-matter, string theory, the Higgs Boson, and singularities.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 20, 2009 14:43:36 GMT -5
I never said it wasn't matter. I meant that both kinds of matter are involved.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Aug 20, 2009 14:53:51 GMT -5
...and how does this all come to relate to "Physics of the Impossible"?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 20, 2009 15:20:01 GMT -5
I don't like this topic. If it is impossible, it therefore defies physics, and the discussion is over.
|
|
|
Post by BlueWinter on Aug 20, 2009 17:16:32 GMT -5
Invisibility is sort of possible today. Scientists have created a prototype 'cloak of invisibility' that can mimic surroundings...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 20, 2009 19:13:16 GMT -5
Wasn't that in the x-ray spectrum?
I think people have teleported photons before, but do they really count?
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Aug 21, 2009 9:32:21 GMT -5
...and how does this all come to relate to "Physics of the Impossible"? I don't like this topic. If it is impossible, it therefore defies physics, and the discussion is over. Actually I believe this is based on THE BOOK Physics Of The Impossible, by Michio Kaku en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physics_of_the_ImpossibleThe book talks about things that people THINK are impossible, but there are ways around it, or people have discovered things that will allow for them. EDIT: Although the development of the technology might be centuries into the future. Invisiblity is possible, by making light BEND. And for people who don't think light can BEND, it already does. Its called Refraction. Invisiblity materials bend light at each point in the material, since the material has different layers of materials inside. So in a sense, the light 'snakes' through' the material. Although its not perfect (only works on microwaves and there is a small 'shadow'), it might be a way to make things invisible in the spectrum of visible light, but that is hard since the layers in the material must be SMALLER than the wavelength.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 21, 2009 10:24:03 GMT -5
Well, if they think it's possible then call it "PHYSICS OF THE IMPROBABLE"
|
|
|
Post by darkraine on Aug 21, 2009 17:08:31 GMT -5
Well then the name isn't as catchy . . .
|
|