|
|
Post by Powderdude2 on Mar 27, 2009 18:31:35 GMT -5
I had an idea that, since some people are dissapointed with content from previous updates. I think, on this site, there should be a vote on all of the requested elements and non elements so that most people would be happier with the updates. Well, what do you think?  |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 27, 2009 21:09:41 GMT -5
Interesting concept... but ultimately, Listo and Ha55ii decide...
Still, quite a nice idea!
|
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Mar 27, 2009 21:46:11 GMT -5
It's good... IF enough people vote.
|
|
|
|
Post by secret on Mar 27, 2009 22:47:30 GMT -5
true
and the other problem is people using firefox can't vote for some unknown technical reason....
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 27, 2009 23:06:09 GMT -5
Who said the votes had to be made in polls? Granted, it would be MUCH easier with polls, but we are not limited to them...
|
|
|
|
Post by greenpatatoe on Mar 28, 2009 6:24:06 GMT -5
Yes, But by my knowledge HA55II tells Thelisto to proggram his chossen element and HA55II dosent come to this site
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 28, 2009 7:28:01 GMT -5
No, Listo comes up with his own ideas.
|
|
wizard
Superior Being
{S=0}[M:-593]
50%
Posts: 399
|
Post by wizard on Mar 28, 2009 9:16:00 GMT -5
true and the other problem is people using firefox can't vote for some unknown technical reason.... AND, SAFARI. so i cant poll either |
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Mar 28, 2009 16:03:51 GMT -5
No, Listo comes up with his own ideas. Actually, I think greenpotato was right. Ha55ii makes the ideas, and Listo programs them. But say we have a good idea in the request an element thread and Listo likes it. He can give the idea to ha55ii and ha55ii will either approve of it or not. I think the main issue here is voting. We'll need to advertise a lot on the forums if we're to get a significant amount of votes for any one idea. Or maybe we can hold this like a tournament. We hold _ number of ideas at a time to vote, people vote for their favorites, and the idea moves to round 2, where it will face other ideas that won round one. It would be long, and it would be hard, but I think we would get the best results this way. |
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 28, 2009 16:26:43 GMT -5
For tournament-style, we may need a certain tree like this:
Level 1
(a1 vs. a2 = b1) (a3 vs. a4 = b2) (a5 vs. a6 = b3) (a7 vs. a8 = b4)
Level 2
(b1 vs. b2 = c1) (b3 vs. b4 = c2)
Level 3
(c1 vs. c2 = Champion)
Competitions within a level would be held simultaneously to decrease the amount of time needed to determine a champion.
|
|
|
|
Post by The One on Mar 29, 2009 16:43:53 GMT -5
Interesting concept... but ultimately, Listo and Ha55ii decide... Still, quite a nice idea! Is there not just one person working on PG? But anyway i think it is a good idea. |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 29, 2009 22:02:31 GMT -5
one person works on PG... but the other hosts the game...
|
|
|
|
Post by The One on Mar 30, 2009 10:47:51 GMT -5
Oh i see, lol i think they should get a army working on PG so we can get a update every day yay!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by greenpatatoe on Apr 4, 2009 1:45:59 GMT -5
Lol, that would be cool!
Anyway back on subject If we did do a poll Ha55ii should put it on Danball then more people would see therefore it would be more fair and get more votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbsndust on Apr 4, 2009 18:28:02 GMT -5
It's good... IF enough people vote. No, not IF enough people vote... IF enough noobs don't vote!  "OMG I WAN GUN AND REAL BOMB AND NUKELEAR AND ANIMALS JAND DINAOSORUS AND CARS AND CAR BOMBS AND SOLDIERSSSS AND PLAYERS/FISGHTERS WITH ARMZ!!!!" "OMG SECONDED!" "OMG THIRDED LOL IS THAT A WROD LOL" "LOOOOOL ROFLMAO!"  |
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Apr 4, 2009 18:47:16 GMT -5
I agree...let's keep this to ourselves (although we can't help if stray newcomers happen to see this thread and post as a guest...).
|
|
wizard
Superior Being
{S=0}[M:-593]
50%
Posts: 399
|
Post by wizard on Apr 4, 2009 19:29:39 GMT -5
not just every day, EVERY MILLISECOND!
|
|
|
|
Post by noodlesoup on Apr 4, 2009 22:51:12 GMT -5
For tournament-style, we may need a certain tree like this:
Level 1
(a1 vs. a2 = b1) (a3 vs. a4 = b2) (a5 vs. a6 = b3) (a7 vs. a8 = b4)
Level 2
(b1 vs. b2 = c1) (b3 vs. b4 = c2)
Level 3
(c1 vs. c2 = Champion)
Competitions within a level would be held simultaneously to decrease the amount of time needed to determine a champion. That's exactly how I wanted it to be. I think we should work on getting this organized, getting people to say they'll participate in it(which we'll need a lot of), then start the poll. |
|
|
|
Post by dbsndust on Apr 4, 2009 23:14:43 GMT -5
But like I said, the vast majority of people on Powder Game are not those who would vote for useful things. Seriously, how come "Too much beer" or whatever is ranked on the all time list with 1500 votes or so (havent checked).
|
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Apr 4, 2009 23:17:40 GMT -5
Isn't this just for the people on the forums?
|
|
[M:7000]
[img src="http://i41.[tinypic].com/2crmzjb.jpg"][img src="http://i43.[tinypic].com/2i88x2s.png"][img src="http://i28.[tinypic].com/67r1mw.jpg"]
[M:2140]
[glow=red,2,300]
