|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 10, 2009 2:48:39 GMT -5
Well, you have a point. It is a form of art...although I still hold by my opinions (minus what I censored). I respect your opinions too, but I felt that I had to make my own heard. [hover=...The Fuhrer is the Nazi dictator's German title. Yes, he was a very complicated, teetotalist, vegetarian, non-smoking individual...someone I should never bring up ever again except in extremely serious debate.] Answer to previous question made into rollover.[/hover] I was being WAY too extreme, and I edited my previous post to include the parenthetical "without all of the racism." I apologize if my mere mention of him offended anyone.  |
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Jan 10, 2009 4:14:01 GMT -5
Wait. Hitler was a Vegetarian? I would figure he could have good values like nt smoking, but he was a vegetarian? Or is he not who you are talking about?
|
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Jan 10, 2009 6:14:42 GMT -5
Well, a whole 2 days has passed, and everything has died down for the community. So there is actually a good chance that it will not be deleted.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty333 on Jan 10, 2009 7:12:48 GMT -5
[hover=i think it is a good pixelart and not pornographic at all]" First Pixel Art" by PG Fan; superb pixel art or inappropriate upload? [/hover] Click here for an image of the upload in three different bgs courtesy of me2 AKA /meThat's a hard one... 1. It's only a pixel art, and you can upload whatever you want to upload. 2. Despite that, you should still make it pleasant for everyone. Which it could be. 3. It does not show any nudity, though. My conclusion: I agree. |
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 11:26:00 GMT -5
I told you already, it's above 'not porn' and 'spurting c**k' (you guys don't remember that). It's gonna stay whether we like it or not.
|
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 10, 2009 11:34:22 GMT -5
I assume not porn didn't know what not meant. So was it porn?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 11:55:38 GMT -5
No, he did that to keep people from deleting
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty333 on Jan 10, 2009 11:59:36 GMT -5
I told you already, it's above 'not porn' and 'spurting c**k' (you guys don't remember that). It's gonna stay whether we like it or not. I know. |
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 12:55:08 GMT -5
Unless members delete it
|
|
|
|
Post by Soul Alchemist on Jan 10, 2009 14:45:00 GMT -5
...
I think you guys are looking at this situation all wrong. I stand with GV's first statement on how even suggestiveness is inappropriate.
Foxtrot, your wrong. yes, 'hormones' are a part of us liking people of the opposite gender more, but do you really think that a stimulus that the brain unconsciously puts into the body for it to grow is that exact/specific to have us look at a barely dressed person of the opposite gender from us? Don't make stupid excuses like "I can't help it! it's just hormones!" you CAN help it. you don't have to look at things like that.
Some guys are (scroll over) [hover=Homosexual]"happy"[/hover]. is that an effect of hormones? Of course not! Yes, most guys do like to look at a barely dressed woman, but that is something that pains me because I don't WANT to look that! if I were to ever look at a barely/fully naked woman, it would be MY [future] WIFE. NOT ANYONE ELSE IN THE UNIVERSE. THAT IS THE PROBLEM WITH SUGGESTIVENESS.
so, I say YES, let us take down that image, and any other even slightly suggestive image that we have put in front of us.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 15:02:05 GMT -5
1: What does homosexuality have to do with this?
2: Homosexuality is the act of the mind believing that it is beneficial, and orders the release of hormones in situations others would not do so.
3: You still don't show that it is indecent enough for removal
|
|
|
|
Post by Soul Alchemist on Jan 10, 2009 15:20:36 GMT -5
...
1.you obviously didn't read my post.
2.you obviously didn't read my post.
3.you obviously didn't read my post.
4.you obviously didn't read my post.
5.you obviously didn't read my post.
6.you obviously didn't read my post. (it's right there!!! 3rd paragraph, 4th to last sentence and on until the end!!)
|
|
|
|
Post by やすあӔ on Jan 10, 2009 16:02:06 GMT -5
Technically, the above post is spam ^_^. The same text is repeated six times.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 16:09:47 GMT -5
Not to mention that you're gonna go against your word one day....
|
|
|
|
Post by Soul Alchemist on Jan 10, 2009 16:18:07 GMT -5
um...no? and yeah, i suppose it does count as spam. sorry about that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 16:23:26 GMT -5
well, I jumped to a conclusion, but that still sounds homophobic and overdramatic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 11, 2009 14:02:43 GMT -5
Not to mention the problem was solved.
|
|
|
|
Post by secret on Feb 3, 2009 5:28:32 GMT -5
Trashed to avoid even further problems
|
|
[M:7000]
[img src="http://i25.[tinypic].com/10ygymt.png"]
[img src="http://i44.[tinypic.com]/29xj4hs.png"][img src="http://i41.[tinypic.com]/2ngdeh1.png"][img src="http://i40.[tinypic.com]/332w078.png"][img src="http://i43.[tinypic.com]/2mcyv7r.png"][img src="http://i44.[tinypic.com]/f6pug.png"]
[img src="http://i42.[tinypic].com/oq9gkj.png"] Fàêå Ñóÿilliñ 
