|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 25, 2009 19:32:02 GMT -5
Exactly. Unless they sneak a nuke in here, without a missile, then we are safe.
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Jun 26, 2009 3:15:18 GMT -5
Yeah and even if they do they'll just get taken over.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 26, 2009 15:17:34 GMT -5
Ye Gods.... Human history is a long round of pain, torture and death in humanity's lust for power. Now is no different. I doubt the US will get nuked, but if they do, I hope the UN doesn't retaliate by blowing up NK.
|
|
|
Post by Mohamad Abd Al Raman on Jun 26, 2009 16:52:59 GMT -5
Am swetting like garry glitter in a play ground
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 26, 2009 22:09:51 GMT -5
I believe, if they do, the UN will most certainly retaliate. So will the United States.
Should I move this to serious debate?
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 27, 2009 2:21:50 GMT -5
If you want. If the UN nukes back at them, they shall prove just to be as bad as the NK leader.
|
|
|
Post by ROBiT on Jun 27, 2009 16:08:50 GMT -5
If you want. If the UN nukes back at them, they shall prove just to be as bad as the NK leader. So if we get nuked we should just say "that's okay" and be friends again?
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 27, 2009 16:11:59 GMT -5
If they kill millions of US citizens it doesn't make it right by killing millions of Korean citizens.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 27, 2009 17:10:01 GMT -5
Whoever mentioned nuking them back? I was referring to actual warfare, avoiding collateral damage.
Qwertymoved
|
|
|
Post by Mohamad Abd Al Raman on Jun 27, 2009 17:22:59 GMT -5
NBC Nuclear niologicle chemical, I learned this in air cadets you will have to put gloves gass mask and cloths on in 20 seconds is gas gas gas is called scary
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Jun 27, 2009 17:32:27 GMT -5
Nuking N. Korea back is the smart thing to do. It's not about 2 wrongs making a right, its about not letting them nuke us again.
|
|
|
Post by dbsndust on Jun 27, 2009 17:32:38 GMT -5
You really believe that stuff? The U.S. technology can intercept any missile that's posed as a threat. Plus it's the world leader >.> You really believe that we can intercept these missles? Tsk tsk, the "Star Wars" project was an utter failure. There's no chance of our survivalAnyway, I beleive we would be justified in launching tactical nuclear weapons at Pyongyang. There's no reason not to, seeing as if we don't they will know that they can fire all they have at Hawaii, Alaska, and even South Korea without fear of retaliation. Those Commies will stop at nothing to get what they want, even if it means nuking a large enemy force in their own country. Hundreds of thousands turned up at an anti-US rally supporting a nuclear strike against us. There is a threat, and this isn't Soviet Russia. It can be dealt with. Now let's do it.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 27, 2009 23:09:18 GMT -5
Everyone seems to think we need to nuke back... nobody ever mentioned that!
Also, I forgot to move this.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 28, 2009 2:50:26 GMT -5
Has no-one any heart? There are just a couple of evil people in NK, and millions of innocents who have unfortunately got a bad leader. I think we've all played too many computer backs and watched too many movies to think of countries as objects. Sometimes I wonder why we have these missiles in the first place...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jun 28, 2009 4:11:09 GMT -5
I was saying that we could simply remove the bad leaders...
it's [/i], not [i/]
We have them as a deterrent against Soviet Russia. At least, we did... during the cold war...
|
|
|
Post by Mohamad Abd Al Raman on Jun 28, 2009 5:15:29 GMT -5
... If the UN nukes back it would be nuclear war. And over countries would join in. This would creat WW3
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Jun 28, 2009 5:57:40 GMT -5
Which is the last thing anyone wants...
|
|
|
Post by Mohamad Abd Al Raman on Jun 28, 2009 6:01:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Mohamad Abd Al Raman on Jul 1, 2009 14:59:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Jul 1, 2009 15:12:11 GMT -5
That sucks...
|
|