|
Post by Sandmaster on Aug 10, 2009 13:11:24 GMT -5
swine flu? is this a joke?
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Aug 10, 2009 13:26:29 GMT -5
yea, SM don't take some of these threads seriously. The more recent debates don't really make sense.
|
|
|
Post by darkraine on Aug 10, 2009 22:09:25 GMT -5
Pretty much, any "debate" thread, or really almost any post by MaaR will result in senselessness and excessive usages of jokes . . . so don't take them seriously, or else you'll end up slowly losing your sanity C:
|
|
|
Post by BlueWinter on Aug 20, 2009 17:12:02 GMT -5
I don't think there will ever be a full-out nuclear war. The whole point of war is to gain territory, and what's the point of getting new land if you can't set foot in it for hundreds of years?
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Aug 20, 2009 17:20:58 GMT -5
The whole point of war isn't just for land, but it tends to be that way since most land will provide the basic needs for living organisms: food, water, and shelter. Indeed, part of WWII was a fight for lebensraum - living space - as well as the unfairness of the Treaty of Versailles and the purification of the world through impure means...
|
|
rubiksmaster123
Superior Being
{S=21}Rubik Ninja[M:-240]
15%
Da Rubiks Cube
Posts: 395
|
Post by rubiksmaster123 on Sept 12, 2009 8:50:54 GMT -5
War isn't just for land. And countries don't just fight for no reason. They have a reason. So maybe there will be a World War III in some time of the future.
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Sept 12, 2009 9:10:55 GMT -5
I think world war 3 is going to happen in a matter of weeks Uh, no. America may have a crap economy, but we stil have a military able to kick their asses. because if you look at North Korea, Iran, china, usa, isreal, credit crunch, glabal warming and swine flu etc the list will just go on. How would 'global warming' and swine flu have any effect on a world war? Again, we have the most powerful military unit on the planet. If they even try to prepare a nuke, they'll be waving bye bye as they drop down to hell. What i think is that when tiny kim starts nuking the place I think iran will join in and start bullying England. Yes, because Tiny Kim is going to nuke everywhere without the U.S.A kicking their asses. Same for Iran, they don't stand a chance against the UN. If the Taliban concurs Pakistan they will get there hands on the nukes. Most likely not gonna happen. Then nuclear world war. Since when do wars happen at random? And since when do wars become all-nuclear?This might end at 2012 who knows just debate about it here. Oh, so 2012 is somehow going to be the day everything ends, a.k.a "Doomsday?" That's nothing but a load of bull, and it still has nothing to do with anything on this topic.
|
|
|
Post by SilentWaves on Sept 13, 2009 18:52:05 GMT -5
North korea: Even if they launch a nuke the only place they even have a CHANCE at hitting is hawaii.
Iran, Iraq: a little troublesome but they cant hit our homeland anyways and the only reason we are still there is to finish what we started...
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Sept 15, 2009 15:50:37 GMT -5
Iran is a real problem. North Korea is more flexible.
North Korea's leader is power hungry, but not necessarily clinically insane, unlike Iran's.
|
|
|
Post by droctagonapus on Dec 16, 2009 1:07:08 GMT -5
@silentwaves has a nuke ever exploded on water? seems like that could kill a lot of fish and cause a fish shortedge, as well as huge tidal waves, but I really dont know much about this topic...
|
|