|
|
Post by Saza on Sept 24, 2009 22:16:26 GMT -5
Yep, it's that lovely time again where you know you'll pick me to get a NEW MOTM! I'm starting this early so A) We can have it on-time this time B) I can't wait. C) It looks nice when it's on-time D) It gives us lots of time to chose. YOU KNOW YOU WANT TO PICK ME!I should stop with subliminal messages before you pick meI get too off-hand. *** IF I'm wrong because of the MoTM thingie where it's last month's MOTM... then somebody fix it. I'm in a total state of confusion.  |
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Sept 25, 2009 14:26:40 GMT -5
I vote you should be it
no seriously, who should it be? well who hasn't had it so far?
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Sept 25, 2009 14:37:14 GMT -5
Moi.
|
|
KuraiOorora
Supreme Member
{S=39}[M:575]
Grand Mist Samurai
Posts: 322
|
Post by KuraiOorora on Sept 25, 2009 15:17:19 GMT -5
That depends......for awhile now it's been only staff.....I believe for once we should have a non-staff member as MOTM.....one that shows such qualities of a deserving award.....
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Sept 25, 2009 15:44:36 GMT -5
But whom? Most people here who people think are nice are staff.
|
|
KuraiOorora
Supreme Member
{S=39}[M:575]
Grand Mist Samurai
Posts: 322
|
Post by KuraiOorora on Sept 25, 2009 15:50:26 GMT -5
Yes, but because of the fact there are so many staff nominations we might as well have a SOTM (Staff of the Month) badge. The MOTM is not only available to staff mind you.
We should find a non-staff member who abides.....and one that actually helps the forum for that matter....
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 1, 2009 17:47:28 GMT -5
Alright, it is October now. Who seemed most helpful and pleasant during the month of September?
|
|
KuraiOorora
Supreme Member
{S=39}[M:575]
Grand Mist Samurai
Posts: 322
|
Post by KuraiOorora on Oct 1, 2009 18:55:37 GMT -5
Hmm.......The One of Open Profanities (In other words, xxx) might be a worthy candidate. He's usually on the chat every time I go on. Plus he is always posting on one topic or another. Both active and respectful......
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 1, 2009 20:43:29 GMT -5
That depends......for awhile now it's been only staff.....I believe for once we should have a non-staff member as MOTM.....one that shows such qualities of a deserving award..... [slightly off-topic]The reason most of them have been staff is because, as I have said many times, we have an outrageously huge staff/member ratio. Sadly, pretty much anyone who is even a remotely good person gets a staff position if just they ask for it. Being a staff member is not nearly as distinguished and prestigious as it used to be.[/slightly off-topic] Back on topic, sadly, no one particularly caught my eye last month. Maybe it's because I haven't been coming here quite as much, what with school and all. |
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 1, 2009 21:19:25 GMT -5
Should we intentionally skip MotM if we can't think of anyone?
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 1, 2009 21:25:32 GMT -5
Hmm........that's a tough one.
Well, the whole point of the MOTM system is to recognize outstanding members. It wouldn't be right to pick a MOTM just for the sake of having one.
So if we can't think of anyone, we should skip it, but that should only be a last resort.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 1, 2009 22:49:40 GMT -5
Speaking of which, TSL, I recently discovered this weird thing called a "life" lying around, and I'm considering giving it a good look-see, so I probably won't be as active.
IN OTHER NEWS, I believe that we should skip it if we can't think of anyone. XXX may be great now, but remember all those bumps when he was new?
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 2, 2009 0:10:44 GMT -5
Speaking of which, TSL, I recently discovered this weird thing called a "life" lying around, and I'm considering giving it a good look-see, so I probably won't be as active. IN OTHER NEWS, I believe that we should skip it if we can't think of anyone. XXX may be great now, but remember all those bumps when he was new? Was that first part supposed to be an insult?  And about the second part, what exactly did XXX do? I never really noticed him. |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 2, 2009 15:08:57 GMT -5
That was an insult to myself, actually. I never knew it existed before.
The second part...
XXX and someone else (called ALP) basically went around bumping all sorts of threads in almost every board.
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 2, 2009 17:44:33 GMT -5
Well, in that case, neither of them would make a good choice.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 3, 2009 23:53:39 GMT -5
ALP left, and XXX got much better. Much, much better. He simply forgot to check the last posting date. Reminds me a bit of you when you first joined, although I only have that info secondhand.
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 4, 2009 0:00:01 GMT -5
Well, yeah, I did do that at first. Everyone does. ;D
But has XXX done anything in particular to be rewarded and recognized for? I mean, usually when someone contributes a lot, I and everyone else notice it.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 4, 2009 0:43:56 GMT -5
He's active, and doesn't flame, spam, or any of that. Given the forum's current condition, that alone is an accomplishment. He is being an active, contributing member.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 4, 2009 8:40:11 GMT -5
Well, I guess we can give him that nomination, then.
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 4, 2009 11:03:13 GMT -5
But as I said before, if we can't find an outstanding person, we shouldn't have a MOTM this month. It doesn't matter what condition the forum is in. We shouldn't award mediocrity or pick a MOTM just for the sake of having one.
|
|
[img src="http://i41.[tinypic].com/2crmzjb.jpg"][img src="http://i43.[tinypic].com/2i88x2s.png"][img src="http://i28.[tinypic].com/67r1mw.jpg"]
[M:7000]
