|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 20, 2009 18:00:35 GMT -5
If I understood Ggoodie correctly, it ends now...
|
|
|
|
Post by dagamer on Oct 20, 2009 18:44:29 GMT -5
;-;
No one voted for me...
[hatred]I SHALL HUNT YOU ALL DOWN AND MOUNT YOUR HEADS ON PHOTO FRAMES IF YOU DON'T MAKE MY AMOUNT OF VOTES AS 1337![/hatred]
GV, GV, GV. Why the FU- *gets banhammord*
|
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Oct 20, 2009 20:45:38 GMT -5
*Puts away banhammer* And that's why you don't troll or [/hatred]!
|
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Oct 20, 2009 21:13:17 GMT -5
It was my understanding that there were to be 8 Chat Mods. And there is a Tie for Eigth.
[CalledIt]
|
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Oct 20, 2009 21:43:12 GMT -5
Actually I think it doesn't matter since the there's room to make all the tied people mods without going over 8. Unless I forgot to count a vote...
|
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Oct 20, 2009 22:02:44 GMT -5
Well you can get 7 People with all the ties over 1...
Unless I missed a vote...
|
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Oct 21, 2009 1:14:22 GMT -5
Here's what I got a few hours ago(still didn't close notepad):
GV: 7
QtP: 7
S4: 3
Jakebob: 4
TSL: 5
M4: 3
GG: 3
Fox: 3
I'll recount it just to make sure..
|
|
|
|
Post by vaconcovat on Oct 21, 2009 1:17:13 GMT -5
Damn. Only 2 people voted for me. D:
|
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Oct 21, 2009 1:48:20 GMT -5
Ok new, better, reliable tallies are up:
GV: 7
JB: 4
Qwertyuiop: 7
TSL: 5
M4: 2
S4: 3
Vacon: 2
GG: 3
FTZ: 3
G: 2
SW: 1
Artik: 1
8 Most Voted:
GV, JB, QtP, TSL, S4, GG, FTZ, and M4/Vacon/G
EDIT: Votes cast before voting time were not counted. Should they be?
|
|
|
|
Post by vaconcovat on Oct 21, 2009 1:58:29 GMT -5
10 chat mods?
Should we do a tie-breaker?
|
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Oct 21, 2009 7:08:50 GMT -5
no dont count those votes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 21, 2009 8:45:33 GMT -5
Then what's the tie-breaker? Another vote for only those three?
|
|
KuraiOorora
Supreme Member
{S=39}[M:575]
Grand Mist Samurai
Posts: 322
|
Post by KuraiOorora on Oct 21, 2009 15:29:14 GMT -5
Sorry I've been gone for the past few days...
It seems you are debating over a so called 'tie-breaker'. Whether this matters at this time I do not know. If you need someone to settle this matter I see myself fit for the job...
|
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Oct 21, 2009 15:42:19 GMT -5
I didn't know we could nominate ourselves...  Well, no one would vote for me anyways, I guess... Besides GG. |
|
|
|
Post by Angel on Oct 21, 2009 16:47:22 GMT -5
D: Nobody voted for me ;~;
|
|
|
|
Post by dagamer on Oct 21, 2009 18:45:54 GMT -5
KO: HAHA you didn't nominate.
XXX: I would.
SZ: SUCK IT IN BISH. YOU WILL ALWAYS BE HATED.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 21, 2009 20:01:26 GMT -5
XXX: I probably would. I just threw SW in there so as not to insult anyone when I vote for someone they dislike.
AZ: You expected someone to?
KO: It's not that kind of tie breaker. Unless you want to break the tie with your vote, or something.
I propose, as a tiebreaker, we re-open the voting, but only for those three. Then, everyone votes again, but again, only on those three. That should sort it out... If, when the voting is over, two or more are even, the first one to get ahead of the others closes the vote.
tl;dr: We vote again on those three and don't take "tie" as an answer.
|
|
|
|
Post by artik on Oct 21, 2009 20:17:44 GMT -5
wait what are we talking about........................pancakes....................
|
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Oct 21, 2009 21:41:46 GMT -5
First of all, M4, your tallies were both incorrect. We should include the people who voted before voting started. It's just not fair not to.
I took this tally immediately after voting ended, and included all votes. Here are the final results.
Ggoodie: 4
Veers: 8
FoxTrot: 3
G: 3
Qwerty: 9
S4: 4
Vacon: 3
M4: 2
Artik: 1
Jakebob: 5
TSL: 6
Swearingworth: 1
Dhoomlord: 1
The top 6 are Qwerty, Veers, Me, Jakebob, Ggoodie, and S4. Then G, Foxtrot, and Vaconcovat are tied.
As a matter of fact, I discussed this with General Veers yesterday, and we decided that we will just have nine instead of eight.
Here are the nine, in order, that will be chosen.
Qwerty: 9
Veers: 8
TheShadowLord: 6
JakeBob: 5
Ggoodie: 4
S4: 4
G: 3
Foxtrot: 3
Vacon: 3
I haven't been able to log on in just a little over a day, and you guys have already caused so much confusion. Seriously, you guys shouldn't have overcomplicated this.
There will be no tiebreaker. We're just going to give the tied people the benefit of the doubt. It's much simpler.
|
|
G
Dedicated Member
{S=0}[M:-1954]
Posts: 986
|
Post by G on Oct 21, 2009 21:54:59 GMT -5
I believe it would be best to just remove my name from the tally.
The main reason we are doing this is because of the unbalanced chat mod to member ratio online at any given time. The main reason why i am not viable for many votes is most likely due to my recent inactivity. the problem is, the very reason for my lack of votes causes the reason for the chat mod voting to be inconsequential in my case. if i have been inactive recently, then it will not be a big problem for the amount of mods online for the majority of the time. when, in addition to this, the fact that someone capable of holding a co-owner position should be able to be trusted as a chat mod, it seems that a tiebreaker would be better served if done between the two remaining nominees.
I could have just decided this and carried it out on my own but i would rather have your opinions on the manner. does anyone have a problem with what i have proposed?
Edit: Actually, scratch that. I Shadows proposal is much less complicated to explain and i see no reason why 8 should be the magical number set in stone.
|
|
[M:7000]
[img src="http://i45.[tinypic].com/3133c60.png"][img src="http://i25.[tinypic].com/10ygymt.png"]
[img src="http://i25.[tinypic].com/10ygymt.png"]
[M:-7020]
[img src="http://i25.[tinypic].com/10ygymt.png"]
