|
Post by ~Kill3r~ on Sept 23, 2008 14:46:30 GMT -5
yeah... that would be stupid!
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 23, 2008 17:24:31 GMT -5
Lol, you could make it a boss contest that you had to beat a certain course in order to kill the boss. But this would be a very fun contest.
|
|
Buggy793
Legendary Member
{S=6}One Fish, Two Fish. Red Fish, Blue Fish.[M:-793]
I never pronounce names wrong. People just want them mispronounced for some reason.
Posts: 815
|
Post by Buggy793 on Sept 23, 2008 23:02:31 GMT -5
The percentages should be weighted a little more, but this could as a contest...
Difficulty: 20% (maybe?)
|
|
|
Post by ganondorf on Sept 24, 2008 9:57:10 GMT -5
I don't care as much what the percentages are as that it has all of those and it adds up to 100%. Change the percents if you like.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 24, 2008 10:11:54 GMT -5
It should get more points if it is very difficult, but possible, than if it is easy and possible. I think it should be difficuly 30%, possible to beat, or whatever it was, 30%, and the same for the rest.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 24, 2008 14:43:24 GMT -5
Can you write that out for everyone in the way I did for the original percents?
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 24, 2008 18:33:07 GMT -5
Ok, here is what I think it should be: 30% for difficulty 20% playability 10% for the ability to fight back 10% for instructions 20% for orginality 10% for neatness
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 25, 2008 9:43:41 GMT -5
Shouldn't playability be higher than diffeculty?
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 25, 2008 10:56:47 GMT -5
I think that if it is not possible to play/beat it, it should be disqualified. Here are some better ones: 25% for difficulty 25% playability 10% for instructions 20% for orginality 20% for neatness I deleted the ability to fight back because an entry should be DQed if it is not possible to fight back. And if you can fight back it goes into the difficulty catergory.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 25, 2008 14:01:14 GMT -5
Ok thats good.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 25, 2008 16:00:32 GMT -5
Thank you
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 26, 2008 14:14:09 GMT -5
Your welcome.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 26, 2008 17:33:52 GMT -5
Lol, what a waste of posts. If you have not seen it, look at my contest idea, C4 "Mandala".
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 28, 2008 12:06:15 GMT -5
Also the boss can be a figher or a group of fighters but it can't be simply use fire to kill all fighters.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 28, 2008 16:07:13 GMT -5
Yes, a group of fighters with the boss behind them would be a challenge. Only if the fighters were protected from the boss though.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 28, 2008 17:34:49 GMT -5
Well what I said was that the boss itself can be fighters but you can have fighters as well as the boss too.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 28, 2008 18:26:41 GMT -5
Oh, yes, a group of fighters being the boss would kind of ruin the point of being creative.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 28, 2008 18:56:35 GMT -5
I did do some creativw ways of having a group of fighters as a boss but they are old uploads that are not original now.
|
|
|
Post by soccerking on Sept 29, 2008 13:54:26 GMT -5
Ya, I have seen some of your uploads.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Sept 29, 2008 14:22:51 GMT -5
You mean someone actually has seen my uploads! (shudders at the thought)
|
|