Post by ToxicPaprika on Jun 8, 2008 4:55:31 GMT -5
Jun 7, 2008 22:17:43 GMT -5 @shirogake said:
How so? The number of mods are fine as is.You shouldn't be complaining about activity; I rarely see YOU here. Also note that many members may not be on at one time, but still active. There are few who are unactive, to be honest. I'm on every day, so you can't say anything about my activity.
What has my activity with this to do?
Also, both to you and to Ghost: I know there's not many members on at the same time, but that doesn't necessarily mean that there's enough staff members. The forums doesn't need a 24 hours a day-watch, and will sure do fine with a small amount of active staff members.
Oh, and by a few, I ment a few compared to the total amount of members. About 30 members of 255 members ain't much, but yeah, it is something. Also, I haven't complained about your activity. In fact, I haven't complained about anything ment negative against the (staff) members.
There were way too many rulebreakers when there were 5 staff members. You seem to not like this, the fact the forums aren't as bad. I have been here for a while, but that's irrelevant.
When did I ever say I liked bad-running forums? Can you mention 5 rulebreakers and/or rulebreaks done when there were just 5 staff members? Can you, or any other staff member, tell me when they last needed to stop a rulebreaker? Can you, or any other staff member, tell me how many times they've had to stop a rulebreaker?
Anyway, my point is, again, the number of mods are fine as is. This forum is still fun, you are barely on, and more than half the members here are active(Come on at least once or twice every week or two.) Also worh noting that the more moderators there are, the more clean and organized this forum is. I survey the forums daily, examining. There are barely any rule-breakers, the forums are more organized with more mods, and everyone has a good time.
I'm not saying that the number of mods are bad in that way, I'm saying that the number of mods makes this place seem like a place vulnerable for rulebreakers! I mean, Moderators are here to stop rulebreakers. Therefore, more moderators means more controll over rulebreakers. When a place has 14 moderators, and no more than 241 avarage members, the place really seems like it doesn't want any rulebreaks to stay for more than a few minutes.
The Unofficial Dan-Ball Forums: 255 / 14 = 18 members for each staff member to watch over.
Hallpass: 122 928 / 8 = 15 366 members for each staff member to watch over, and the place goes perfectly fine.
The Easytoon Place: 651 / 3 = 217 members for each staff member to watch over, and the place goes perfectly fine.
1001 Spill.no: 7767 / 7 = 1110 members for each staff to watch over, and the place goes perfectly fine.
So, ToxicPaprika(Yes, I know who you are), what else have you to throw at me?
You make it all sound like an attempt to insult and flame the staff! Oh, and I doubt anyone didn't know I was ToxicPaprika.