|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 9, 2009 15:49:26 GMT -5
Just a new type of catergorirs. Unstable means it will be gone a few seconds after creation unless preserved ( thunder fire laser suds ) reactive means it is destroyed on contact with elements ( bomb virus snow) and everything else is stable.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 0:19:03 GMT -5
That isn't a good category, since it isn't a state of matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 10, 2009 10:05:20 GMT -5
It is not a catorgory. It is group of catergorireis, like states and "families" , which secret list both. Not all catorgeries are by state.
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 11:33:20 GMT -5
This is called a nonchemical reaction. It is unassociated with states of matter because states of matter are based on nonchemical MOVEMENT, not dissapearence.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mt on Jan 10, 2009 12:42:42 GMT -5
But how much about an element can you really find out with only the state of matter? I think stability is good, because it tells you 'can this element exist undisturbed forever?' But the only element that comes to my mind that doesn't is steam..
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 12:53:27 GMT -5
Fire.
This is not going to affect the states of matter, because they are based on movement, not reactivity.
|
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 10, 2009 13:39:54 GMT -5
For the last time this has nothing to do with state and doesn't have to deal with state. Now stop doing that!
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 10, 2009 15:00:00 GMT -5
Why didn't you say s....wait....you did.
Nevermind then.
|
|
|
|
Post by secret on Jan 18, 2009 0:57:30 GMT -5
states of matter and reactivity are two different things
States of matter is based on the MOVEMENT
While reactivity is based on the tendency to react
Maybe I'll make a reactivity series later...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 20, 2009 17:44:31 GMT -5
Reactivity is far too complex as each element would form it's own reaction and such
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 2, 2009 11:11:14 GMT -5
You really want to be against it, don't you?
just don't say "FSGF" "God" or "infinity"
|
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Feb 2, 2009 15:18:33 GMT -5
New reactive: acid
When are we going to get stable elements agian.....
|
|
|
|
Post by secret on Feb 2, 2009 23:22:58 GMT -5
God knows....
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Feb 3, 2009 16:46:53 GMT -5
Secret said it before me. Better lock it quick:
How could He know if He doesn't exist?
|
|
[img src="http://i42.[tinypic].com/oq9gkj.png"] Fàêå Ñóÿilliñ 
