|
Post by SM on Mar 2, 2009 17:38:58 GMT -5
Sorry, I'm kind of in a hurry.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 2, 2009 18:00:59 GMT -5
Ok. I admit we will be ripped to shreds by the opposing forces when entering a black hole. But there might be a chance of wormholes appearing.
|
|
|
Post by Sand Master on Mar 2, 2009 18:34:00 GMT -5
But how can a wormhole exist without breaching dimensions, which is impossible.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 2, 2009 18:42:18 GMT -5
They are practically improbable (and nearly impossible), although "mathematically possible"...(how?)
Of course, reality and practicality are all that count in the real and practical world, no?
|
|
|
Post by Sand Master on Mar 2, 2009 18:44:41 GMT -5
But both are defined by logic and physics, and wormholes defy both.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 2, 2009 18:47:04 GMT -5
I really would like to see how anyone figured that a wormhole was mathematically possible...
|
|
|
Post by Sand Master on Mar 2, 2009 18:49:24 GMT -5
But the thing is that it ISN'T possible in the first place!
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 2, 2009 18:51:59 GMT -5
That may be so, but I still want to see how physicists reached the opposite conclusion in the first place. What was their work? How far of a stretch is it (don't answer unless you are one of those physicists who reached that conclusion)? How realistic is it (don't answer unless you are one of those physicists who reached that conclusion)?
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 3, 2009 14:21:04 GMT -5
NB, i think reading the brief history of time will enlighten you there ( the newer version)
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 4, 2009 6:51:29 GMT -5
Wormholes are unlikely to ever be harnessed in a saf way for humans.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 4, 2009 12:09:02 GMT -5
Obviously, we will be ripped to shreds.
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 4, 2009 15:06:21 GMT -5
I doubt that Wormholes are even real.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 4, 2009 15:20:18 GMT -5
They arn't, they are just a theory. When anything gets sucked into a black hole, it just collapses on one point of singularity. Why would it pass through to another region of space, or dimensions for that matter?
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 4, 2009 21:58:20 GMT -5
I would imagine that the matter and energy are stored there until the death of the Black Hole, after which they are released.
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Mar 4, 2009 22:00:02 GMT -5
I don't think we can have an informative debate on black holes considering they are still theory. It confuses me sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 4, 2009 22:01:41 GMT -5
I agree, spaghetti. this debate is mostly pointless until we gather some concrete information on Black Holes.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 4, 2009 22:30:45 GMT -5
That's what the first post is for...
NASA has evidence of superdense entities which, by definition, are black holes.
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 4, 2009 22:32:01 GMT -5
I'm not saying that they aren't real, just that we don't have enough info on them to have an in-depth discussion.
|
|
|
Post by Sand Master on Mar 5, 2009 17:27:31 GMT -5
I would imagine that the matter and energy are stored there until the death of the Black Hole, after which they are released. That's called GRAVITY. A lot of objects in space do that. Black holes do too, and being dense doesn't make it a singularity. Also, black holes HAVE been proven to exist, as there have been 'sightins,' that while we can't see them, we can use X-rays and star movement and suc to do so.
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on Mar 5, 2009 17:32:34 GMT -5
So you agree with me?
|
|