|
Post by General Veers on Mar 8, 2009 22:24:07 GMT -5
You remind me of Xeno's paradox.
If you were to freeze me at any given moment in time, I would have a finite amount of matter. However, if you "play" time, you would see me change mass on account of eating and excreting.
The same applies to a black hole, which "eats" and "excretes."
|
|
|
Post by spaghetticat on Mar 8, 2009 22:53:58 GMT -5
Either way infinity is impossble. P
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 8, 2009 23:13:34 GMT -5
Ever since reply #215 I thought you were saying that they did have infinite mass even at a specific point in time. I'm getting confused now...
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 8, 2009 23:15:55 GMT -5
If they had infinite mass, why are some black holes larger than others?
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 8, 2009 23:17:33 GMT -5
They don't.
...although if they did, one could argue that some approached infinity faster than others did...
|
|
|
Post by SM on Mar 9, 2009 14:50:40 GMT -5
Spaghetticat, stop bullsh*ting with your own contradictory statements.
A black hole with a singularity of infinite density and finite mass has 0 mass and therefore will fly apart. A black hole with a singularity of infinite mass and finite density has infinite mass and therefore everything will fly towards it at infinite speeds.
A singularity must therefore have finite mass and finite density to exist.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 9, 2009 16:33:14 GMT -5
Yes. If it does have finite mass, exactly how much mass is there?
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 9, 2009 16:33:28 GMT -5
Spaghetticat, stop bullsh*ting with your own contradictory statements. A black hole with a singularity of infinite density and finite mass has 0 mass and therefore will fly apart. Hold on, a black hole with finite mass has zero mass? Yes, zero is finite, but what you said just seems...erratical. D=M/V Infinity=0/V
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 9, 2009 16:34:09 GMT -5
It's a contradiction that proves my point
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 9, 2009 16:35:35 GMT -5
Wait...so infinity is 0 divided by volume? I dont get that...
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 9, 2009 16:36:41 GMT -5
According to Sandmaster, no one is supposed to get it, because there is nothing to get: it's illogical and erratical.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 9, 2009 16:41:57 GMT -5
that reminds me of SM. Anything else to disagree about?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 9, 2009 17:21:48 GMT -5
Yes. People think wormholes exist
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 15, 2009 12:36:35 GMT -5
Well, its theoretically possible. Black holes could bend the universe so it bends towards the singularity so if you could get into one you would arrive half the universe away.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 24, 2009 8:21:37 GMT -5
THE....UNIVERSE.....DOESN'T.......HAVE.......HOLES.
|
|
|
Post by bluerooste42 on May 3, 2009 20:44:45 GMT -5
I think black holes are just holes that connect to each other.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on May 4, 2009 8:00:23 GMT -5
bluerooste42, please don't bump. IF no-one has posted in it for a long time, check the date of the last post.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on May 5, 2009 20:58:53 GMT -5
Well, in debate, if people have something new to contribute, then they can share it. However, what was posted was already disproved and ruled illogical.
|
|
|
Post by Randomness on May 6, 2009 12:25:06 GMT -5
Well, yeah. I know all of your first post while i was researching black holes (i was bored) but i realised they werent as wierd as they seemed. In fact, theyre completely logical....
By the way, ive seen to the edge of the universe (or whatever its called) and it tells you a hell of alot about... well... almost anything interesting, watch it.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on May 6, 2009 13:30:25 GMT -5
by the way, SM, I said THEORETICALLY.
|
|