|
Post by jakebob on Mar 15, 2009 6:18:33 GMT -5
*rubs temples*
Are you trying to insinuate that, after a while, evolution would bring about an increase in size? The reason microbes are called microbes is because they are perpetually small, so small they can't be seen with the naked eye. "Microbe" is not a specie, it is a micro-organism.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 15, 2009 11:41:03 GMT -5
No, I am not implying an increase in size. That is possible, but I simply mean mutations in general. I realize that "microbe" is not a specie (and I'm glad you know the singular form); I purposely used a broad, collective term to imply that anything with such small life spans could easily be observed for the effects of natural selection and evolution in a relatively short amount of time within a single human lifetime...
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 15, 2009 12:04:54 GMT -5
I think he meant me, NB.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 15, 2009 12:31:14 GMT -5
Ah, sorry about that...
I'll keep my post there just in case, however...
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 15, 2009 12:33:46 GMT -5
Anyway nb, your could answer my post. Peoples, get voting in the poll!
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 15, 2009 19:24:40 GMT -5
Look, the polls here rarely ever work. It is useless to ask people to vote.
Anyhow, speciation is why not all monkeys are humans. That, and we are more closely related to the Chimpanzee.
|
|
|
Post by jakebob on Mar 16, 2009 4:56:00 GMT -5
Yeah, I was talking at tdm.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 16, 2009 9:29:52 GMT -5
I was talking to...
I forgot, but it wasn't you.
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 19, 2009 14:01:40 GMT -5
Ah well, it doesn't matter who we were talking to. So, are we all agreed with Evolution?
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Mar 19, 2009 14:45:01 GMT -5
I do believe that we are, for the most part. A majority of the posters seem to believe, that much I can state...
Whether we agree to every detail or not is another question entirely...
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 19, 2009 16:48:02 GMT -5
Well, it still has the same basic point. We adapted and evolved through natural selection and genetic mutations.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 24, 2009 8:23:12 GMT -5
it's very fun to look at creationists on the internet. they yell a lot
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 24, 2009 12:14:13 GMT -5
Yup, they say evidence doesn'tpoint to evolution, but to creation. So lets see the evidence for Creation: A 2000 year-old piece of Hebrew text which has been extremely embelished. Evolution: Many years of scientific study on fossils, skeletons that is NOT based on faith. Creationists are...strange (to put it politely)
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Mar 24, 2009 17:52:27 GMT -5
and all of them have abandoned this thread...
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 25, 2009 9:01:10 GMT -5
thats because we've reached a conclusion
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 25, 2009 9:25:37 GMT -5
I think the only creationist on this thread was SC. Where is he, anyways?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 25, 2009 9:48:46 GMT -5
gone
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 25, 2009 9:56:31 GMT -5
Gone where?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Mar 25, 2009 10:10:26 GMT -5
away from here
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on Mar 25, 2009 10:18:07 GMT -5
er......can you be a bit more specific? At least you didn't say 'to a better place'
|
|