|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 3, 2009 13:24:25 GMT -5
I don't really like the idea that we are just animals. If we were, then why aren't any other animals just as smart as us? P.S. I'm a Jehovah's Witness, not that anyone cares. P.S.s. It's HOMO SAPIENS, not HUMO. Intelligence is completely relative. It's an evolutionary weapon to try and compete with other life forms. That's why bacteria rever develop some intelligence (or a brain, for that matter) yet. Because they don't NEED to.
|
|
|
Post by sigh on Jan 4, 2009 15:24:02 GMT -5
Well, technically, they do. It's called a nucleus.
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 4, 2009 17:02:34 GMT -5
well, no. The nucleus, as much information it has stored inside it, is not capable of deep thought.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 5, 2009 15:31:21 GMT -5
Or at least were pretty sure....but then there is slime molds....
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 5, 2009 19:25:37 GMT -5
......what?
The brain is composed of billions of cells DESIGNED for this kinda stuff, which is why it is such an awesome computer (did you know the brain was by Microsoft?)
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 5, 2009 19:29:38 GMT -5
Our creator works for Bill Gates? Well, not so now that Gates is no longer CEO of Microsoft...
What does this have to do with dragons?
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 5, 2009 20:12:09 GMT -5
IDK I have no idea what you mean by creator.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 5, 2009 20:14:25 GMT -5
A being in which you do not believe, may I be correct. Maybe if I would have used a capitol c, you would have known I was referring to God. You said Microsoft made brains, and I was joking around.
Nonetheless...
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 5, 2009 20:35:41 GMT -5
Well, Mac's make eyes and vocal cords, but for some reason, they don't interact well....
Hmmmm.......
|
|
|
Post by theultamate on Jan 6, 2009 8:00:50 GMT -5
Hmmmmmmm...... indeed
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 6, 2009 16:54:18 GMT -5
I think theultimate is one of the defective ones....safari or linux-run brain...
|
|
|
Post by theultamate on Jan 7, 2009 4:57:23 GMT -5
*gasp* i run on Microsoft! AND Ive got a 3D accelerator so...ha!
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 7, 2009 21:46:14 GMT -5
See? He probably still runs on '98 and he hasn't even bothered with the 4D download!
BTW I still think that as real as they mey or may not be, this could be considered relatively innacurate. I mean....MAGIC??
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 7, 2009 21:49:37 GMT -5
What about magic?
Non-real dragons have every thing to do with magic. p
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Jan 7, 2009 21:54:50 GMT -5
But they aren't real, then. If I want to consider their existance, illogical explanations for anti-physics is not the answer.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 7, 2009 22:00:43 GMT -5
I MIGHT (with some good argument) believe that there are dragons which can "breate" fire via chemical reactions and what not, but I would not believe in easily accessible telekinesis.
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 7, 2009 22:06:17 GMT -5
The article at the begining is on ALL dragons, real or not.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 8, 2009 17:17:29 GMT -5
What are your opinions on dragons?Fearsome beast? Great here? First gods of mankind? Real or totaly imaginary? Some of us were taking into account that last question of yours, finding it soemthing to debate. Nonetheless... - Some would be fearsome, others wouldn't.
- I'm not quite sure I fully understand that question. I guess we don't really pay too much attention to dragons nowadays over where I am (don't reveal that information AGAIN, please).
- For reasons that would get this thread locked, I do not believe that they are the first gods of mankind.
- This is the part we were discussing...
|
|
|
Post by I wuv M4( Satar Jaèoèdoæ) on Jan 8, 2009 19:00:09 GMT -5
Except for the last and first part I don't rember writing those in that wording....
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 8, 2009 19:19:58 GMT -5
I didn't modify the quote: you can check your first post if you want to.
|
|