|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on May 5, 2009 21:37:40 GMT -5
Well? What do you think?
|
|
PickleMan
Dedicated Member
{S=9}Head Programmer[M:98188]
Posts: 936
|
Post by PickleMan on May 5, 2009 21:39:12 GMT -5
Neither. I would choose sourceism. Its a bit like communism, a bit like socialism, has NO commerical aspect to it...
|
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on May 5, 2009 21:42:24 GMT -5
Hmm... I would pick either Matriarchy, Patriarchy, or Aristocracy. Each of them would be quite interesting.
|
|
|
|
Post by dbsndust on May 5, 2009 23:49:14 GMT -5
Wait, isn't matriarchy like marriage? And patriarchy like a guardian?  Hmmm... *goggle* OSHI VIRUS! *back* *google* Matriarchy--Government by the women, like the Amazonians Patriarchy--Government by family structure. I would choose... Hey! Of all the things you forgot Communism! And Democracy, and Democratic-Republic, and Tribalism, and Obamanism, and... well you get my point. I would choose dictatorship as long as I was dictator. Why? Because it would be fun  |
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on May 6, 2009 2:03:34 GMT -5
We already have a thread about this- What Gvt. would bring peace? Not exactly the same but I can't see the point in having both.
I don't even know what half of those governments are....
|
|
|
|
Post by V.I.R.O.S. on May 6, 2009 5:30:13 GMT -5
The other one is old and dead, and this one is new and alive. >.>
|
|
|
|
Post by The Dark Master on May 6, 2009 9:49:07 GMT -5
Can someone though explain to me most of them?
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on May 6, 2009 16:35:08 GMT -5
I'd choose a constitutional socio-anarchy, but that's never going to happen.
|
|
[M:2140]
[glow=red,2,300]
