|
|
Post by shirogake on Sept 21, 2008 15:49:22 GMT -5
(OMFG he can read my mind)
|
|
G
Dedicated Member
{S=0}[M:-1954]
Posts: 986
|
Post by G on Sept 22, 2008 0:05:34 GMT -5
you mean you can't?
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Kill3r~ on Sept 22, 2008 8:26:45 GMT -5
lol... everyone knows that swearing worth can read people's minds!
|
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Nov 13, 2008 13:05:48 GMT -5
I have two suggestions for these rules
1. I think it should be okay to double post IF it has been at least 24 hours after your previous post.
2. I think a 'No sexual harrassment' rule should be put in place. Here's how it would go:
Sexual Harrassment
Risk: Instant ban
Sexual harrassment is anything to sexually insult another member. We know of this behavior and we don't tolerate it. We don't care whether you're joking or not, ANY sexual harrassment will earn you instant, and most likely permanent, ban. Again, we don't tolerate such behavior. Saying anything like "u queer", etc, is and will be deemed as sexual harrassment.
I couldn't think of many examples for sexual harrassment other than "u queer" =/ Thanks for reading. |
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Nov 13, 2008 16:04:28 GMT -5
The second one ought to be placed in the rules, not just "suggested." I'm surprised it wasn't in there to begin with. Then again, we haven't had any problems with sexual harrassment, have we?
So yes, excellent idea to insta-ban, likely permanently, sexuall harrassers.
|
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Nov 14, 2008 10:19:25 GMT -5
We have not had any problems with sexual harrassment, but this IS the Internet. It's only a matter of time before people like that show up here. Come to think of it, there's already sexual harrassment on the DBCB.
And I'm glad you agree with me.
|
|
Buggy793
Legendary Member
{S=6}One Fish, Two Fish. Red Fish, Blue Fish.[M:-793]
I never pronounce names wrong. People just want them mispronounced for some reason.
Posts: 815
|
Post by Buggy793 on Nov 14, 2008 10:58:02 GMT -5
Yeah, and we don't want these to end up like the DBCB. Those are the evil ranges of Dan-ball where all the evil ones live, and we constantly try to bring them to the light that it's a mess, but they refuse to change...
In other words, we don't want this to fail. Keep up the good work, add a sexual harrassment rule.
|
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Nov 14, 2008 11:38:30 GMT -5
Done. I also centered it to make it look better.
|
|
|
|
Post by shirogake on Nov 14, 2008 11:39:15 GMT -5
Done. I also centered it to make it look better.
|
|
Buggy793
Legendary Member
{S=6}One Fish, Two Fish. Red Fish, Blue Fish.[M:-793]
I never pronounce names wrong. People just want them mispronounced for some reason.
Posts: 815
|
Post by Buggy793 on Nov 14, 2008 18:18:59 GMT -5
Yeah, that's better.
By the way, you double posted. I know it was an accident, but just telling you. Kind of ironic that it's on the rules thread...
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Dec 7, 2008 15:52:57 GMT -5
lol.. I like Zyro's Idea's for rules... they are all good for this site...
rule 1 example:
some one has a shop...
It dies with their post....
They are updating it....
but there is now way for anyone to see it...
so they have to post again saying:
UPDATE, socks added
____________________
Rule 2 example:
A guy comes and says:
your queer...
to Monochrome
He gets offended and quits...
and we lose a great security admin...
|
|
|
|
Post by thelisto on Dec 9, 2008 15:24:24 GMT -5
I have two suggestions for these rules
1. I think it should be okay to double post IF it has been at least 24 hours after your previous post.
2. I think a 'No sexual harrassment' rule should be put in place. Here's how it would go:
Sexual Harrassment
Risk: Instant ban
Sexual harrassment is anything to sexually insult another member. We know of this behavior and we don't tolerate it. We don't care whether you're joking or not, ANY sexual harrassment will earn you instant, and most likely permanent, ban. Again, we don't tolerate such behavior. Saying anything like "u queer", etc, is and will be deemed as sexual harrassment.
I couldn't think of many examples for sexual harrassment other than "u queer" =/ Thanks for reading. I don't think it should be an instant ban, I can prevent people from sending PM's to Everyone or Certain people. |
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Dec 9, 2008 16:39:11 GMT -5
Listo, are you paranoid? I do recall that time...
Harrasment could just be considered trolling and should be given the same result.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Dec 9, 2008 18:26:46 GMT -5
True, but sexual harassment (to us irrational paranoid people) seems way worse than any other harassment, and therefore should have worse retribution...
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Dec 10, 2008 10:30:23 GMT -5
Yes... Sexual Harrasment should be a two week ban...
so they get the lesson...
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Dec 10, 2008 15:29:00 GMT -5
I think that it should be forever.
Sexual predators, if they ever do come, would not ever be trusted to refrain from something that is habitual for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Dec 10, 2008 18:45:15 GMT -5
Hmmm...
Well, I can't argue any more anyhow, can I?
They probably should get a warning for first offense...
|
|
|
|
Post by Sandmaster on Dec 10, 2008 22:08:13 GMT -5
only problem is that there is a difference between 'troll' and 'sexual harrasment'
|
|
|
|
Post by ~Memzak~ on Dec 11, 2008 3:05:14 GMT -5
Yes, definetly there is....
but I wouldn't go so far to ban them forever....
just a 2 week ban first then forever...
|
|
|
|
Post by secret on Dec 11, 2008 8:46:19 GMT -5
Something concerned about double post....
I don't know whether you've noticed but guests can't modify their posts....
So if he want to make some corrections, he'll have to post again
And that's double post...
How should we modify the double post rule in order to solve the above problem?
|
|
[M:7000]
