|
|
Post by artik on Aug 26, 2009 19:05:30 GMT -5
Many people think that reviving old threads is a bad thing, but have they ever thought why? It's better than making clone topics! This is a very little thing, but I still think it should be removed from The Rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by darkraine on Aug 26, 2009 20:43:12 GMT -5
I've actually never thought about it like that, but I have to agree . . . if the topic is still valid, bumping/reviving should be allowed. But there are certain situations where it shouldn't, for example, lets say somebody posted something on a "Powder Game v4.8" thread, then they might as well make a new topic regarding that. But topics that have no "expiration date" actually should be allowed to be revived.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 26, 2009 21:13:26 GMT -5
There are anti-bump rules on pretty much every forum I can find... Anyway, it should stay. Be extended, maybe, but stay.
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Aug 26, 2009 22:19:28 GMT -5
In fact, we already are lenient on threads that you find in the games such as Micro Panda, Planet Simulation, Compasses, and other unpopular game boards, as well as for stories and debate threads...
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Aug 27, 2009 3:24:06 GMT -5
Yeah, so long as it isn't a totally worthless post. It's bumping something from three pages back that ticks us off.
|
|
|
|
Post by ShiningSilver on Aug 27, 2009 15:13:58 GMT -5
What do you mean Qwerty, "three pages off"?
|
|
|
|
Post by darkraine on Aug 27, 2009 19:38:50 GMT -5
I think he means, going to the 3rd page of threads, finding an inactive tread, and bumping it . . .
|
|
[M:7000]
