tackew
Greater Being
{S=0}so Ive haerd you liek mudkipz[M:-110]
5%
memes ftw, Its over 9000, this is Sparta, RAWR
Posts: 251
|
Post by tackew on Aug 11, 2009 10:27:05 GMT -5
Which is better (in terms of damage in the least time)?
a lightsaber with topaz 2
or
a fire saber with ruby 2
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Aug 11, 2009 15:56:14 GMT -5
This thread belongs in the Stick Ranger board.
As for the question, I don't know since I don't use gladiators. I'll let someone else answer...
|
|
|
|
Post by majorlee on Aug 11, 2009 16:18:07 GMT -5
both versions have their up- and downsides:
Fire Saber 3 is stronger but Lightsaber 2 has a wider range (as the WHOLE sword gives elemental damage).
But the fire is lasting for a short time, while the thunder is directly connected to the sword...
so it's just a matter of you own preference. ; )
|
|
|
|
Post by superpickle on Aug 11, 2009 16:46:02 GMT -5
Do you mean the fire sabel, or the flame sword? The fire sabel is strong in a different way than the flame sword and the lightsaber. The fire sabel is more focused on the basic attack, while the lightsaber and flame sword are more based around the magic attack. I would say that overall the flame sword is the best, but you should have a garnet and a ruby equipped to make full use of the flame sword, while the lighsaber can be used with just a topaz, leaving another compo slot open. Why I think the flame sword is better:  It has a lager range than the long sword, plus those flames can hit multiple times if you're lucky, and the average damage is better than the lightning. |
|
|
|
Post by me2 on Aug 11, 2009 16:48:32 GMT -5
I think Flame Sword (with Ruby 2 and Garnet 2) is better than Lightsaber (with Topaz 2).
But I'm not sure about Flame Sword and Fire Sabel.
/me
|
|
[M:7000]
