|
Post by ONYX on Nov 1, 2009 8:45:33 GMT -5
Was my unbanishment fair? Honestly I don't even think my banishment was nececary. But enough about my oopinion. Show urs.
|
|
|
Post by artik on Nov 1, 2009 10:26:47 GMT -5
who are you
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Nov 1, 2009 10:51:40 GMT -5
I can't wait till this thread causes your re-banishment lol xD
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Nov 1, 2009 14:17:41 GMT -5
Oh yes, it was completely fair. He's been active on chat despite a forum ban for over a year. He's a better member than many people who have yet to be banned. And, really, we need members who are as dedicated to the forums as he is.
|
|
|
Post by ROBiT on Nov 1, 2009 21:18:13 GMT -5
Oh, hell yeah he deserved it. I'm a bit fuzzy, but I know for sure he lied (a lot), impersonated Listo, spammed, and (not sure) posted porn. edit: Then he kept coming back with proxies and was rebanned several times. How's that for a "dedicated member", qwerty?
|
|
|
Post by artik on Nov 1, 2009 21:24:52 GMT -5
who is this guy
|
|
|
Post by ONYX on Nov 1, 2009 21:28:25 GMT -5
Never used proxies. My E mail was banned not my IP, lieing isn't against rules and do I lie anymore. No. And I don't post porn on forum.
|
|
|
Post by SilentWaves on Nov 1, 2009 21:34:25 GMT -5
I cant find the "Nike was a retard for making a poll about his own banishment" button
|
|
|
Post by SilentWaves on Nov 1, 2009 21:35:06 GMT -5
eh PIE! and CAKE!!! should express my opinion nicely
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Nov 1, 2009 21:43:08 GMT -5
TIGER Is Nike. Or, as we all know him, Elton.
Watch it. This thread is already on Thin ice and I have half a mind to lock it.
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Nov 1, 2009 22:16:09 GMT -5
foxxy no abuse.
|
|
|
Post by -M4- on Nov 1, 2009 23:09:21 GMT -5
Nike's banishment was fair. He impersonated Listo, which qualified him for bannage under the rule of "No Impersonating" or even the "Acting like an idiot and purposely breaking the rules" rule.
But that was why he was banned, which isn't the real question. Did he deserve to be unbanned? I think so, he has improved as a member, enough to qualify him for the unban he received.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Nov 1, 2009 23:22:14 GMT -5
I'm not sure if I'll regret this, but I will voice my opinion. Keep in mind that this opinion is only valid for the extent of my knowledge that it covers: if I am ignorant of some details, that part of the opinion may be considered null and void.
I have learned that your conviction was for impersonating TheListo. Impersonation alone is already a felony in these forums, but impersonating TheListo, who was the site owner at the time you impersonated him, is like someone impersonating God in a group of Christians. The action is nearly equivalent to a sin, and is entirely intolerable. At the time, and for a great deal of time afterwards, a long period of banishment seems fitting.
To the extent of my knowledge, you have acted like Rebel scum, but you didn't go quite so far as to become Luke Skywalker (which in my view is a very evil thing). I don't believe I've heard that you ever tried to take down the forums: instead, you waited until you could get back on. That proved yourself better than Luke Skywalker himself (a.k.a. Molopoy, who plagiarized code and threatened to destroy the forums, getting himself permabanned). Now, although your "rebellious" past is still in many members' memories, you seem more "Imperialized" (which in my view is a very good thing).
Be sure to continue abiding by rules, both in Rousseau's social contract and explicitly in our rules, and there shouldn't be a problem. That statement, naturally, applies to all forum members, myself included...
|
|
|
Post by dagamer on Nov 2, 2009 2:06:20 GMT -5
I'm not sure if I'll regret this, but I will voice my opinion. Keep in mind that this opinion is only valid for the extent of my knowledge that it covers: if I am ignorant of some details, that part of the opinion may be considered null and void.
I have learned that your conviction was for impersonating TheListo. Impersonation alone is already a felony in these forums, but impersonating TheListo, who was the site owner at the time you impersonated him, is like someone impersonating God in a group of Christians. The action is nearly equivalent to a sin, and is entirely intolerable. At the time, and for a great deal of time afterwards, a long period of banishment seems fitting. To the extent of my knowledge, you have acted like Rebel scum, but you didn't go quite so far as to become Luke Skywalker (which in my view is a very evil thing). I don't believe I've heard that you ever tried to take down the forums: instead, you waited until you could get back on. That proved yourself better than Luke Skywalker himself (a.k.a. Molopoy, who plagiarized code and threatened to destroy the forums, getting himself permabanned). Now, although your "rebellious" past is still in many members' memories, you seem more "Imperialized" (which in my view is a very good thing). Be sure to continue abiding by rules, both in Rousseau's social contract and explicitly in our rules, and there shouldn't be a problem. That statement, naturally, applies to all forum members, myself included... I agree with that. Although, he could be molopoy using a permnent proxy. o.O
|
|
|
Post by vaconcovat on Nov 2, 2009 6:40:59 GMT -5
We probably SHOULD lock this....
|
|
|
Post by GGoodie on Nov 2, 2009 7:52:34 GMT -5
why? Is this thread against the rules in some way?
|
|
|
Post by ONYX on Nov 2, 2009 8:51:52 GMT -5
Dought it. Umm. Well If I'm Impereal I want a Tri Graja Plasma Cannon for a Main Weapon xD. And Guys. This is if my Unbanishment Fair. Not my banishment
|
|
|
Post by artik on Nov 2, 2009 9:30:32 GMT -5
Why am I never here when something bad happens? I never saw Nike impersonating Listo and I never saw Molopoy do anything.. I miss all the cool stuff D:
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Nov 2, 2009 20:19:48 GMT -5
The banishment was fair, and so was the unbanishment. Short and simple.
|
|