|
Post by Skribbblie on Feb 22, 2010 22:10:31 GMT -5
(Fast+Fast) + (Furious+Furious)= 2Fast +2Furious= Falcon Punch!
Punch+Me=Ow. Tempy+Qwerty= An epic endless war. I'll be back. With MOAR!
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 22, 2010 22:38:17 GMT -5
Fox2 is not the normal Fox. He is the evil Fox, who has taken over.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 22, 2010 23:18:07 GMT -5
So, Veers plus twice the fail is an evil version of Fox.
I wonder where MF comes into this equation?
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Feb 23, 2010 0:14:45 GMT -5
Given:
1. Dead Forum = Suckish Forum 2. Live Forum = Awesome Forum 3. Suckishness = -AwesomenessDead Forum + TSL = Live Forum Dead Forum - Forum + TSL = Live Forum - Forum Dead + TSL = Live Suckish + TSL = Awesome Suckish - Suckish + TSL = Awesome - Suckish TSL = Awesome - (-Awesome) TSL = Awesome + Awesome Therefore: TSL = 2Awesome
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 23, 2010 0:45:47 GMT -5
MF*Veers=-1 Veers=-1/MF
Qwerty said Veers+2Fail=Fox2 which means (-1/MF)+2Fail=Fox2 That is where I fit in
I will be compiling a list of true statements soon. I will put these on the first post. For future reference say whatever you want in your post, but at the end, put all of the statements you have made/deduced. I will review them and then enter them in the true statements list. Format should be as follows:
Created Statements:
Blank=Blank Blank+Blank=BlankBlank Whatever...
Deduced Statements:
Blank=Blank Sources: Blank*Blank=Blank sources are whatever was used to deduce the statement. Sources must come from A. The true statements list. Or B. From your created statements.
Blank=2Blank Sources: BlankBlank+(Blank*Blank)=Blank Blank=(1/3)Blank Whatever...
Note: Upon compiling true statements I found MANY UN-TRUE STATEMENTS!!! THIS IS BAD!!! If you made a statement which did not make it on the list (now posted) is was a logical fallacy. This is a NO NO.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 23, 2010 10:16:29 GMT -5
... Actually, if a statement applies to fact, then clearly there is something wrong with pre-existing statements, not with the current ones. It's not a fallacy to state a well-accepted fact. Anyway, why are you the one to decide what is a mathematical fallacy and what is not?
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 23, 2010 18:39:06 GMT -5
Here is how it works... Once a person states something it is true UNLESS it conflicts with earlier statements. Even if their statements make no sense, or things derived from those statements make no sense, they are still accepted into this thread's mathematical dogma. You cannot invalidate statements unless they conflict with previously made statements.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 23, 2010 20:06:53 GMT -5
Good point.
And, shouldn't statements that make no sense be invalidated? For instance, if I say MF + Veers - Fox = Qwerty without any form of math leading up to that, can't it safely be invalidated?
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 23, 2010 20:24:50 GMT -5
For Pete's sake, can you not understand??? MF^2=-.5 was not based on math, it was just funny, this whole thing rests on no math at all, yet relies on people posting new, random, funny math statements. It's funny, that's all. Any statement which contradicts earlier work though is obviously false in our contrived world.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 24, 2010 1:19:15 GMT -5
That's not what I was talking about. I am talking about starting off with basic arithmetic that is not true NOR funny. Like, Veers + Listo = Fail, or something. Things that are OBVIOUSLY not true OR funny.
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 24, 2010 9:38:25 GMT -5
Well, you didn't say that... I wouldn't invalidate it, though I would warn the author of their blunder and tell them to post more in the spirit of the board. Which by the way seems to have been quashed by your little argument. So, revival time.
Qwerty + manners = order Qwerty - manners chaos (Even fewer manners) Qwerty = order - manners Qwerty = chaos + manners order - manners = chaos + manners order - chaos = 2 manners order - order-1 = 2manners order/1 - 1/order = 2manners (order2-1)/order = 2manners ((order - 1)(order + 1)) /( 2order*manners) = 0 This may come in handy
Created Statements:
Qwerty + manners = order Qwerty - manners chaos
Deduced Statements:
((order - 1)(order + 1)) /( 2order*manners) = 0 Sources: Chaos = Order-1 Qwerty + manners = order Qwerty - manners chaos (Even fewer manners)
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Feb 24, 2010 19:40:22 GMT -5
Umm....
Friendly + Abused = XXX? XXX - Abused = MegaLoler XXX - Friendly = Molopoy
I guess?
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 24, 2010 19:51:49 GMT -5
Ha, that's a good one, I like it. This game makes me happy. *Eyes wander off upward and to the left, with a far off cloudy look.
Abused = Abusive-1 Friendly = -Unfriendly
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 25, 2010 0:15:16 GMT -5
TSL = 2Awesome
2Awesome = Too + Awesome
TSL = Too + Awesome.
Therefore, TSL is too awesome.
Also, how DARE you insult me mathematically! Your manners were WAY worse than mine on that thread! I merely said that it belongs in About the Site.
Also, Qwerty - manners chaos isn't a valid mathematical statement. I call fallacy.
*abuses a bunch of friendly people to create an army of XXX's*
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Feb 25, 2010 21:01:57 GMT -5
(XXX - Abused) + TSL = Qwerty Listo + Serious = General Veers XXX + Supermike = 2Supermike or 2XXX General Veers(Qwerty) = Listo Listo + XXX = SYNTAX ERROR. XXX + Serious = KuraiOorora
|
|
|
Post by microfarad on Feb 25, 2010 21:38:38 GMT -5
This is waaaaaaayyyyyyy too much to keep up on. Does anybody have a systematic way for checking for logical fallacies and compiling true statements?
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 25, 2010 21:40:55 GMT -5
Megaloler and TSL are my parents?
That's a union that would be a tad odd to see.
I guess you mean you two do not mix? And that supermike = xxx?
|
|
|
Post by Paradox on Feb 26, 2010 7:31:23 GMT -5
Well, he (Supermike) said that I was extremely alike to himself.
Vertigo + Izacque = 2Izacque KuraiOorora + General Veers - Serious = Listo Listo + ShortCakes + Chat = Ban
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 26, 2010 10:12:29 GMT -5
You would need KuraiOorora + General Veers - 2(Serious) = Listo, case Kurai is serious, too.
|
|
|
Post by Skribbblie on Feb 27, 2010 18:47:26 GMT -5
Listo+Listo=2MuchListo! Skribbblie+Skribbblie=Undefined. Qwerty+Qwerty=A guy and a keyboard. Farad+Farad=Veers-Veers Listo+Qwerty+Skribbblie+Veers+Kurai+Farad+everybodyelse=A strange, mad, crazy place. Called ODBF.
|
|