Post by General Veers on Sept 20, 2009 11:04:55 GMT -5
Drseaweed has just made his nth violation here and two posts below.
I plan on sending him the following message:
This last part is one in which I need your approval in order to fairly execute. He has made this offense too many times, showing no respect for anyone around him. He also must not realize that the way in which he provides his messages detracts from how seriously we can take the messages. I do believe he will either stop or soon not have the chance to continue longer if we implement this constant doubling of warnings whenever he creates his disrespectful messages. Do any of you permit me to provide such warnings?
Also, drseaweed made a double-post. This would not be subject to the constant doubling of his warning, but would simply result in a 5% addition.
I plan on sending him the following message:
Drseaweed, have you learned absolutely nothing? There are alternate ways of conveying similar messages without being disrespectful. Reply #8, although not the best example, is a good way of respectfully getting your messages across. Your double-post reply #9 and reply #11 are quite the opposite. You demonstrate absolutely no respect for anyone who has a dissimilar interest from you. Your intolerance shall not itself be tolerated.
Not only are there written/typed contracts between an organization and its members, there is also an unwritten contract which Jean Jaques Rousseau referred to as "the social contract." In such contracts, an organization and its members both have certain rights. When such rights are violated, the contract permits the violated person to ensure that those rights are preserved. When two different rights conflict, such as your right to free expression and all other members' right to respect, the rights of the majority are upheld. Rights are not licensed. In joining the Official Dan-Ball Forums, you agreed to maintain respect either in the typed agreement, or both that and Rousseau's social contract.
You are violating others rights, so it is my duty to restore the prevailing right.
Be respectful, or do not come to these official forums.
Your warning for this type of offense will be raised exponentially since linear warnings seem to do naught to correct your behavior. This one in particular will be brought from 25% to 50%, and then you will go from 50% to a ban. Should you continue, you will go from a day ban to a two-day ban, and from a two-day ban to a four-day ban.
Not only are there written/typed contracts between an organization and its members, there is also an unwritten contract which Jean Jaques Rousseau referred to as "the social contract." In such contracts, an organization and its members both have certain rights. When such rights are violated, the contract permits the violated person to ensure that those rights are preserved. When two different rights conflict, such as your right to free expression and all other members' right to respect, the rights of the majority are upheld. Rights are not licensed. In joining the Official Dan-Ball Forums, you agreed to maintain respect either in the typed agreement, or both that and Rousseau's social contract.
You are violating others rights, so it is my duty to restore the prevailing right.
Be respectful, or do not come to these official forums.
Your warning for this type of offense will be raised exponentially since linear warnings seem to do naught to correct your behavior. This one in particular will be brought from 25% to 50%, and then you will go from 50% to a ban. Should you continue, you will go from a day ban to a two-day ban, and from a two-day ban to a four-day ban.
This last part is one in which I need your approval in order to fairly execute. He has made this offense too many times, showing no respect for anyone around him. He also must not realize that the way in which he provides his messages detracts from how seriously we can take the messages. I do believe he will either stop or soon not have the chance to continue longer if we implement this constant doubling of warnings whenever he creates his disrespectful messages. Do any of you permit me to provide such warnings?
Also, drseaweed made a double-post. This would not be subject to the constant doubling of his warning, but would simply result in a 5% addition.