|
|
Post by jakebob on Oct 29, 2009 7:18:09 GMT -5
Should this be punished? I was going to edit it, but didn't know how it should be punished.
|
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Oct 29, 2009 8:45:26 GMT -5
He was probably joking, and, considering this is a PG-13 forum, the occasional swear is fine, so if we do warn him, it should be very low. My vote is for no warning at all or just 5% warning; people say worse things all the time and get away with it, and what he said really isn't that bad, compared to what other people have said.
I used way too many commas in the first sentence.
|
|
|
|
Post by jakebob on Oct 29, 2009 15:52:00 GMT -5
Well, even if it's someone like BoL, it's rather unprovoked to call someone a "fvck noob" in a respect thread. He could have said that he's a noob, or just "No."
|
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Oct 29, 2009 16:01:57 GMT -5
Considering MaaR's history of offenses, aside from an avatar problem in his Warning Notes, I gave him a 5% warning. I also must wonder if MaaR was just kidding as noted, or if he actually meant to create a provoking statement. In either case, I believe a 5% warning is fully justified.  I wonder if he can learn to follow rules here... [offtopic] On another note, I wonder what happened to the *facepalm* censor? I really liked that one, and needed it before the last on-topic sentence in this thread...Apparently, I need to surround "facepalm" with single colons, such as :smiley_goes_here:...[/offtopic] |
|
|
|
Post by vaconcovat on Oct 30, 2009 0:29:47 GMT -5
@veers: wasnt it : : and ::ninja::? |
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Nov 1, 2009 14:52:54 GMT -5
|
|
[M:7000]
-