|
Post by Qwerty on Jan 7, 2010 9:45:29 GMT -5
...And when the unban? As much as you want to permaban him, flaming and giving out someone else's PI isn't a permaban offense. Plenty of others have done far worse with not so much as a warning level.
Also, would someone mind giving my new account moderating powers? It's kinda hard to be staff on chat if I can't... you know... be staff on chat.
|
|
|
Post by General Veers on Jan 7, 2010 15:24:23 GMT -5
I don't know why there's apparently a rumor about others being able to make chatters into moderators, but I'm going to say it again:
Only the chat owner may make someone a chat moderator. I am fully capable of adding/deleting in the Staff Chat, but I am incapable of the same in TheListo's forum chat without his account, the password of which I forgot (unless it's the same as the forum account)...
I have made Temporarily9 a moderator in the Staff Chat and removed QwertyuiopThePie from Staff Chat by removing moderating abilities.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Jan 7, 2010 23:59:12 GMT -5
Veers, that is grand and thank you, with one problem: My Temporarily9 account doesn't have chat mod powers. Are you sure you spelled it right?
Wait, I read it again, staff chat. Okay, that's good, thanks.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 19, 2010 18:56:08 GMT -5
artik IP: 141.156.250.XXX Banned: Fri Feb 19, 3:53pm By: FoxtrotZero About three pages of this.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 19, 2010 23:19:27 GMT -5
You do realize you need to include an unban date, right?
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 20, 2010 4:22:28 GMT -5
I'm not sure what the times on these things are. He broke the rules and I enforced them, then I reported it.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 20, 2010 15:16:36 GMT -5
Just pick a time. You can't perma him for spamming... Unless it was porn...
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 22, 2010 10:00:20 GMT -5
Well it seems to be over now, but one thing is biting at me.
Artik is constantly breaking the rules and ALWAYS getting away with it.
Once in a while its spamming. He's constantly blowing people off and more than repeatedly has he taken derogatory phrases, notably ones that are 'technically' not violations, in stride, such as with his newest 'FGT'.
It also bothers the hell out of me that he seems to be arrogant and cannot spell, but that is beside the point; i can't speak for others, but its pissing me off and i'm going to start clamping his arse for it whenever I see it.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 22, 2010 20:01:20 GMT -5
So is Dhoom. So are a few other members.
Except Dhoom actually uses the longer version of FGT.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 23, 2010 20:27:25 GMT -5
Foxtrotone IP: 67.183.26.XXX Banned: Tue Feb 23, 5:23pm By: FoxtrotZero For: Impersonation Until: Further Notice
I'd be unsurprised if it was dhoom. But i'm not letting this guy off the hook until we find out who it is. Can someone cross-check the IPs for me?
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 23, 2010 20:32:38 GMT -5
Let's see... IP archive...
It's not on it, but it hasn't been updated in awhile. We can leave it banned until the person tells us.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 24, 2010 23:16:08 GMT -5
BladeOfTheListo IP: 143.238.209.XXX Banned: Wed Feb 24, 8:13pm By: FoxtrotZero For: Derogatory Slurs Until: Wed Feb 24 11:13PM
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 25, 2010 0:05:09 GMT -5
He was talking to himself, but still.
Why is it Ozone and Artik can post it all the time and get away with it? Seriously, I tempbanned Artik for it and he was unbanned within the hour. Or maybe that was Ozone. I forgot which.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 25, 2010 10:00:36 GMT -5
Probably lack of communication and formal justice.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 25, 2010 23:46:12 GMT -5
Then we shall do both. ANYONE using any form of racial discrimination or that sort of thing, can be tempbanned on sight. That includes well-known members.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 26, 2010 0:06:09 GMT -5
Wonderful.
Thats good, because i was already de-facto enforcing that policy.
Naturally, this will probably gain a bias of turning a blind eye towards the most minor of offences by members more-liked, but just the same, these members are the ones who get into trouble less, so its not completely unjustified, where as those who wish to eradicate any bias at all, well, its still valid.
Luckily, the type of people who would heavily associate with the more troublesome members don't seem to be the same as the staff members. Not to say they can't be, but this is the way it is, regardless of the reason, though the reason is simply association and outward behavior being linked, and troublesome behavior being quite the opposite of what we look for in any potential staff member.
Anyway. As long as it works out, we should be good.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 27, 2010 2:52:50 GMT -5
Speaking of which, I forgot to unban Dhoom for mentioning Americunts earlier today.
|
|
|
Post by FoxtrotZero on Feb 27, 2010 3:45:00 GMT -5
Well thats disturbing, but rather spot on, if i were to say so myself.
Yet still oddly vulgar.
|
|
|
Post by Qwerty on Feb 27, 2010 4:12:19 GMT -5
Anyway, I took care of it, but I don't think he even knew. He was gone by the time I banned him and he hasn't been complaining about it.
Dhoom, banned for one hour from the time this was posted. He posted a rule-34 involving Pikachu and a large-breasted Samus. I don't care that it was fully clothed, it was still porn, and we don't let members get away with that just because they are "respected". This was after he posted images of drawings of people in semi-transparent clothes and a picture of Samus with some transparent clothes, although it technically covered all the other bits. He's lucky this is only an hour.
This is completely against chat rules. Same thing with Ozone calling everyone by a derogatory remark. We really need to crack down on this. Nobody posting rule 34 pictures or calling others fa-gs, even if they do it all the time.
|
|
|
Post by xShadowLordx on Mar 15, 2010 19:38:30 GMT -5
dhoom ip: 70.77.244.* banned: Mon Mar 15, 4:32pm by: vertigo111
Banned for posting porn on chat.
|
|